[PATCH] ARM: vic: register the VIC for ST-modified VIC's

[linus.walleij@stericsson.com (Linus Walleij)]

On 11/23/2011 04:43 PM, Jamie Iles wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 04:39:26PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>    
>> On 11/23/2011 04:28 PM, Jamie Iles wrote:
>>      
>>> When probing the VIC, the ST variant has a different probing method to
>>> account for the extra interrupts which meant we didn't previously call
>>> vic_register() which registered the irq_domain.
>>>
>>> Cc: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
>>> Cc: Russell King<rmk+linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
>>> Cc: Marc Zyngier<marc.zyngier@arm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles<jamie@jamieiles.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I _think_ it's just Nomadik affected here which I don't have access to.
>>> I can send an updated pull request or put it in Russell's tracker,
>>> whichever is easiest.
>>>        
>> This also affects mach-u300 and mach-ep93xx OTOH.
>>
>> This seems to be based on something else that is out-of-tree
>> so I don't get the whole picture...
>>      
> Sorry, should have specified the base - this is the VIC device
> tree/MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER stuff that is in next.  I did look at u300 and
> ep93xx, but it looks like their VIC's are 0x1000/0x10000 apart
> respectively when registered so weren't the ST type that supported 64
> IRQ's.
>    

Aha OK now I get the difference.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Thanks!
Linus Walleij