From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mchehab@redhat.com (Mauro Carvalho Chehab) Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 18:06:01 -0200 Subject: [PATCH RESEND] davinci: dm646x: move vpif related code to driver core header from platform In-Reply-To: References: <1321110362-6699-1-git-send-email-manjunath.hadli@ti.com> <4ECE8764.60800@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4ECEA3A9.1080506@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Em 24-11-2011 16:22, Nori, Sekhar escreveu: > Hi Mauro, > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 23:35:24, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Em 12-11-2011 13:06, Manjunath Hadli escreveu: >>> move vpif related code for capture and display drivers >>> from dm646x platform header file to vpif_types.h as these definitions >>> are related to driver code more than the platform or board. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli >> >> Manju, >> >> Why are you re-sending a patch? >> >> My understanding is that you're maintaining the davinci patches, so it is >> up to you to put those patches on your tree and send me a pull request when >> they're done. So, please, don't pollute the ML re-sending emails that >> are for yourself to handle. > > Since this particular patch touches arch/arm/mach-davinci > as well as drivers/media/video, the plan was to queue the > patch through ARM tree with your Ack. We did not get your > ack the last time around[1] so it was resent. > > Do let me know if your ack is not needed. > > Thanks, > Sekhar > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/davinci-linux-open-source at linux.davincidsp.com/msg21840.html Hmm.. I missed this email, but just re-sending it without request my ACK doesn't help much ;) If this ever happens again, next time the better is to forward me the patch again, on an email asking for my ack. With regards to the patch: Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Regards, Mauro