From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2] arm/tegra: convert tegra20 to GIC devicetree binding
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 18:17:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED513A7.4060102@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF174FDAFADC@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
On 11/29/2011 06:13 PM, Stephen Warren :
> Cousson, Benoit wrote at Tuesday, November 29, 2011 6:01 AM:
>> Hi Stephen& Peter,
>>
>> On 11/29/2011 1:54 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> From: pdeschrijver at nvidia.com<pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> @@ -125,6 +131,14 @@ void __init tegra_init_irq(void)
>>> gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask = tegra_unmask;
>>> gic_arch_extn.irq_retrigger = tegra_retrigger;
>>>
>>> - gic_init(0, 29, IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_ARM_INT_DIST_BASE),
>>> - IO_ADDRESS(TEGRA_ARM_PERIF_BASE + 0x100));
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>> + /* Check if there is a devicetree present as of_irq_init doesn't
>>> + * indicate if an interrupt controller node was found.
>>> + */
>>> + if (of_find_node_by_path("/"))
>>> + of_irq_init(tegra_irq_match);
>>> + else
>>> +#endif
>>
>> For the same kind of need, I found the following API:
>>
>> of_have_populated_dt()
>>
>> Moreover, it returns false if !CONFIG_OF, so it will avoid the #ifdef.
>
> That sounds like a great idea. Unfortunately, of_irq_init() is a DT-only
> function. Exynos has the following in mainline to solve this:
>
> if (!of_have_populated_dt())
> gic_init_bases(...);
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> else
> of_irq_init(exynos4_dt_irq_match);
> #endif
>
> Perhaps we should add a dummy of_irq_init() too, so that we can remove
> this ifdef.
+1 for this idea: I have the same issue with at91.
I think that a macro is preferred instead a function: it will also
remove the need for a protection for the matching table.
Best regards,
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-29 17:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-29 0:54 [PATCH V2] arm/tegra: convert tegra20 to GIC devicetree binding Stephen Warren
2011-11-29 13:00 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-11-29 17:13 ` Stephen Warren
2011-11-29 17:17 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2011-11-29 17:47 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-11-29 19:52 ` Rob Herring
2011-11-29 21:08 ` Stephen Warren
2011-11-29 22:24 ` Rob Herring
2011-11-29 22:58 ` Stephen Warren
2011-11-29 23:16 ` Rob Herring
2011-11-29 23:22 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ED513A7.4060102@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox