From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: Look for hwmod/module level context lost count if supported
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:10:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ED52007.8010804@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1320317665-6381-4-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com>
Hi Rajendra,
Sorry for the delay, I kind of forgot your series :-(
On 11/3/2011 11:54 AM, Nayak, Rajendra wrote:
> Now that OMAP4 has hwmod/module level context lost counters, make
> omap_hwmod_get_context_loss_count() return them on platforms where they
> exist, else fall back on the pwrdm level counters for older platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak<rnayak@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> index ac17748..9d140c4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c
> @@ -2658,9 +2658,14 @@ u32 omap_hwmod_get_context_loss_count(struct omap_hwmod *oh)
> struct powerdomain *pwrdm;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - pwrdm = omap_hwmod_get_pwrdm(oh);
> - if (pwrdm)
> - ret = pwrdm_get_context_loss_count(pwrdm);
> + if (oh->prcm.omap4.context_offs) {
I don't think it is safe to use that, since this is an union.
You do know what OMAP2 & 3 will put in that location.
It might be zero, but who knows?
> + /* Support for per-hwmod context register */
> + ret = oh->prcm.omap4.context_lost_counter;
> + } else {
> + pwrdm = omap_hwmod_get_pwrdm(oh);
> + if (pwrdm)
> + ret = pwrdm_get_context_loss_count(pwrdm);
> + }
>
> return ret;
> }
Regards,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-29 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-03 10:54 [PATCH 0/3] Support omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count() for OMAP4 Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-03 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: OMAP: hmwod: Add support for per hwmod/module context lost count Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-03 10:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: Update/Clear module specific context lost counters Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-03 10:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: Look for hwmod/module level context lost count if supported Rajendra Nayak
2011-11-29 18:10 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2011-12-02 4:46 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-16 11:16 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 11:23 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 12:21 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-16 12:38 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 12:17 ` Rajendra Nayak
2011-12-16 12:38 ` Paul Walmsley
2011-12-16 12:41 ` Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4ED52007.8010804@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).