From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring) Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 13:56:00 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver In-Reply-To: <20111206114952.GS14542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1322867573.11728.22.camel@pasglop> <20111205161157.GA27550@localhost.localdomain> <20111205180253.GB29812@localhost.localdomain> <20111205192605.GD29812@localhost.localdomain> <20111206093709.GB2274@linaro.org> <20111206104654.GN14542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20111206113735.GC2274@linaro.org> <20111206114952.GS14542@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <4EDE7350.4010104@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/06/2011 05:49 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:37:35AM +0000, Dave Martin wrote: >> 1) All OF code and drivers should be migrating to use 0 instead of NO_IRQ >> for the no-interrupt case. Code which receives irq numbers directly >> from the OF framework and refers to NO_IRQ, or expects 0 to be a valid >> needs to be fixed. >> >> 2) Where we hit a problem, board code needs to be adapted to remap HW IRQs >> 0-15 to different software values. (This could be done using irq >> domains, or not) > > No AMBA driver I'm aware of ever uses an IRQ number 0 or is passed such > an IRQ number. The watchdog on VersatileAB is on Linux IRQ0. This is easily fixed with VIC irqdomain patches which are queued up. Rob