From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier) Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:04:20 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v4] ARM: sched_clock: allow sched_clock to be selected at runtime In-Reply-To: <029b01ccbacc$b5fdb6e0$21f924a0$%kim@samsung.com> References: <1323444833-10587-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com> <029b01ccbacc$b5fdb6e0$21f924a0$%kim@samsung.com> Message-ID: <4EE9D434.2010900@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 15/12/11 01:56, Kukjin Kim wrote: > Marc Zyngier wrote: >> >> sched_clock() is yet another blocker on the road to the single >> image. This patch implements an idea by Russell King: >> >> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg49561.html >> >> Instead of asking the platform to implement both sched_clock() >> itself and the rollover callback, simply register a read() >> function, and let the ARM code care about sched_clock() itself, >> the conversion to ns and the rollover. sched_clock() uses >> this read() function as an indirection to the platform code. >> If the platform doesn't provide a read(), the code falls back >> to the jiffy counter (just like the default sched_clock). >> >> This allow some simplifications and possibly some footprint gain >> when multiple platforms are compiled in. Among the drawbacks, >> the removal of the *_fixed_sched_clock optimization which could >> negatively impact some platforms (sa1100, tegra, versatile >> and omap). >> >> Tested on 11MPCore, OMAP4 and Tegra. >> >> Cc: Imre Kaloz >> Cc: Krzysztof Halasa >> Cc: Tony Lindgren >> Cc: Eric Miao >> Cc: Colin Cross >> Cc: Erik Gilling >> Cc: Olof Johansson >> Cc: Linus Walleij >> Cc: Sascha Hauer >> Cc: Alessandro Rubini >> Cc: STEricsson >> Cc: Lennert Buytenhek >> Cc: Nicolas Pitre >> Cc: Ben Dooks >> Cc: Kukjin Kim > > Hi Marc, > > There is a complaining with checkpatch. > > ERROR: trailing whitespace > #376: FILE: arch/arm/kernel/sched_clock.c:163: > +^I^Isetup_sched_clock(jiffy_sched_clock_read, 32, HZ);^I$ > > And build warning: > > arch/arm/plat-s5p/s5p-time.c: In function 's5p_read_sched_clock': > arch/arm/plat-s5p/s5p-time.c:328: warning: 'return' with no value, in > function returning non-void > > I'm not sure what is proper return value in this case... Good catch. The return value should be 0, and I'll update the patch now. > Anyway, others, looks ok to me and tested on Samsung S5P boards. > Acked-by: Kukjin Kim Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...