linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: holger.brunck@keymile.com (Holger Brunck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: label string for kirkwood gpiochip
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:40:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EEA06C8.5010302@keymile.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1112150920430.2907@xanadu.home>

On 12/15/2011 03:22 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>>
>> The newer kernel version handles the gpiochip on kirkwood in a different way.
>> The orion_gpio_init function in arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/irq.c was called twice.
>> Once for first 32 gpios and a second time for the remaining 18 gpios. This
>> causes that the gpio framework shows two gpiochips in the sysfs with the same
>> label (orion_gpio).
>>
>> [@km_kirkwood /]# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpiochip0/label
>> orion_gpio
>> [@km_kirkwood /]# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpiochip32/label
>> orion_gpio
>>
>> So my question is simply, shouldn't be the string for a gpiochip unique in the
>> system and therefore this should be fixed or was this intended?
> 
> I don't think that was intended.
> 

Ok, how should this be done? We could add an additional  param chip_label to

void __init orion_gpio_init(int gpio_base, int ngpio,
                            u32 base, int mask_offset, int secondary_irq_base);

and fix the callers accordingly or we could add a simple static counter in
orion_gpio_init and add a suffix _0, _1, _2 to the label to make it unique
without touching the clients...

Best regards
Holger

  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-15 14:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-15 13:54 label string for kirkwood gpiochip Holger Brunck
2011-12-15 14:22 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-12-15 14:40   ` Holger Brunck [this message]
2011-12-17 16:44     ` Nicolas Pitre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EEA06C8.5010302@keymile.com \
    --to=holger.brunck@keymile.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).