From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rnayak@ti.com (Rajendra Nayak) Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 18:11:08 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP: hwmod: Look for hwmod/module level context lost count if supported In-Reply-To: References: <1320317665-6381-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <1320317665-6381-4-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <4ED52007.8010804@ti.com> <4ED85835.7080108@ti.com> <4EEB36E5.8020504@ti.com> Message-ID: <4EEB3C64.30008@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Friday 16 December 2011 06:08 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > >> On Friday 16 December 2011 04:46 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: >>> >>> Hi Rajendra, >>> >>> I've combined your patches down to one patch and changed the logic a >>> little bit. It looks to me that the update and clear context registers >>> can be done in one step, since an IP block shouldn't lose context when >>> it's enabled. But maybe I'm missing something? >> >> Thanks for the patch. The changes look fine and I also did a quick >> test on an internal tree which supports core OSWR and it seems to >> work fine too. > > Great, thanks. Will wait on this one until you have a chance to tinker > with it during the 3.4 time frame. Sure, will work some more on this and maybe re-submit it with open switch RET support on OMAP4 when it would really be useful and can also be tested to work well. thanks, Rajendra > > > - Paul