From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 20:12:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH RFC] ARM: at91: removal of CAP9 SoC family In-Reply-To: <20120113181637.GA30300@suse.de> References: <1325864033-20012-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> <4F101137.1020804@atmel.com> <20120113181637.GA30300@suse.de> Message-ID: <4F108235.80104@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 01/13/2012 07:16 PM, Greg KH : > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:10:47PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >> On 01/06/2012 04:33 PM, Nicolas Ferre : >>> Atmel CAP9 family is not maintained well and products may be >>> difficult to find now. It will allow to save workforce and >>> remove LOC during current cleanup process. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre >>> --- >>> Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 14 ++++++++++++++ >>> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> Hi Andrew, Greg, >> >> Can you please take this patch or is somebody else in charge of this file? > > Why wouldn't the maintainers of the feature you are saying is going away > be the ones responsible for submitting this? Actually, I am the guy ;-) >> It it is going to mainline through you, can you add also: >> >> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD >> >> Or tell me to resend a complete patch. >> >> Thanks for your help, best regards, >> >> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt >>> index 3d84912..23dfea5 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt >>> +++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt >>> @@ -551,3 +551,17 @@ When: 3.5 >>> Why: The iwlagn module has been renamed iwlwifi. The alias will be around >>> for backward compatibility for several cycles and then dropped. >>> Who: Don Fry >>> + >>> +---------------------------- >>> + >>> +What: The CAP9 SoC family will be removed >>> +When: 3.4 >>> +Files: arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9.c >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/at91cap9_devices.c >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9.h >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_matrix.h >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91cap9_ddrsdr.h >>> + arch/arm/mach-at91/board-cap9adk.c >>> +Why: The code is not actively maintained and platforms are now hard to find. >>> +Who: Nicolas Ferre >>> + Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > > Ok, why not send this through the ARM tree? Why need me and Andrew? Ok, I though there was a special procedure for this file. I will queue this one in arm-soc tree. Thanks, best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre