From: rmallon@gmail.com (Ryan Mallon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/11] ep93xx: Move crunch code to mach-ep93xx directory
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:16:53 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F109F45.9020105@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ADE657CA350FB648AAC2C43247A983F001F3F99EBB11@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net>
On 14/01/12 04:51, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 10, 2012 8:15 PM, Ryan Mallon wrote:
>> The crunch code in arch/arm/kernel is specific to the EP93xx. Move
>> it to the mach-ep93xx directory. This removes the need for the
>> EP93XX_SYSCON defines to be exported to arch/arm/kernel.
>>
>> Cc: Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
>> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@iki.fi>
>> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 3 ---
>> arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/Makefile | 3 +++
>> arch/arm/{kernel => mach-ep93xx}/crunch-bits.S | 0
>> arch/arm/{kernel => mach-ep93xx}/crunch.c | 2 ++
>> 4 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) rename arch/arm/{kernel => mach-ep93xx}/crunch-bits.S (100%) rename arch/arm/{kernel => mach-ep93xx}/crunch.c (99%)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile index 16eed6a..57aa6c9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/Makefile
>> @@ -62,9 +62,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SWP_EMULATE) += swp_emulate.o
>> CFLAGS_swp_emulate.o := -Wa,-march=armv7-a
>> obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT) += hw_breakpoint.o
>>
>> -obj-$(CONFIG_CRUNCH) += crunch.o crunch-bits.o
>> -AFLAGS_crunch-bits.o := -Wa,-mcpu=ep9312
>> -
>> obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_XSCALE) += xscale-cp0.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_XSC3) += xscale-cp0.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_MOHAWK) += xscale-cp0.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/Makefile b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/Makefile index 574209d..0dc51f9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/Makefile
>> @@ -8,6 +8,9 @@ obj- :=
>>
>> obj-$(CONFIG_EP93XX_DMA) += dma.o
>>
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_CRUNCH) += crunch.o crunch-bits.o
>> +AFLAGS_crunch-bits.o := -Wa,-mcpu=ep9312
>> +
> Nitpick... Care to align the core stuff above this while you are touching this file?
>
> Also, does the compile order matter here? Should the crunch stuff come before
> the dma driver?
I was hoping that Russell would make some comment here about whether
moving this file out of arch/arm/kernel is okay to do. I assume it had
some reason to be there in the first place. I have only done build
testing so far since I don't have any ep93xx hardware to test on, and
have never actually used crunch anyway.
I don't want to make unnecessary changes in this patch. I think the
include of "soc.h" should actually get moved to the next patch also, so
that this patch becomes a straight out move.
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_ADSSPHERE) += adssphere.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_EDB93XX) += edb93xx.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_GESBC9312) += gesbc9312.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/crunch-bits.S b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch-bits.S
>> similarity index 100%
>> rename from arch/arm/kernel/crunch-bits.S rename to arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch-bits.S
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/crunch.c b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c similarity index 99% rename from arch/arm/kernel/crunch.c rename to arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c index > 25ef223..d05ed0b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/crunch.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/crunch.c
>> @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@
>> #include <mach/ep93xx-regs.h>
>> #include <asm/thread_notify.h>
>>
>> +#include "soc.h"
>> +
>> struct crunch_state *crunch_owner;
>>
>> void crunch_task_release(struct thread_info *thread)
> While you are moving this, is there anything you can do about the sparse
> warning regarding the crunch_owner variable?
>
What is the warning?
> Regardless, looks good.
>
> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers.com>
>
Thanks,
~Ryan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-13 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-11 3:14 [PATCH 00/11] ep93xx: Move SoC private bits to core Ryan Mallon
2012-01-11 3:14 ` [PATCH 01/11] ep93xx: Move PHYS_BASE defines to local SoC header file Ryan Mallon
2012-01-13 17:18 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-01-13 21:35 ` Ryan Mallon
2012-01-11 3:14 ` [PATCH 02/11] ep93xx: Move GPIO defines to gpio-ep93xx.h Ryan Mallon
2012-01-13 17:22 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-01-11 3:14 ` [PATCH 03/11] ep93xx: Move peripheral defines to local SoC header Ryan Mallon
2012-01-13 17:25 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-01-11 3:14 ` [PATCH 04/11] ep93xx: Configure GPIO ports in core code Ryan Mallon
2012-01-13 6:27 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-01-13 7:00 ` Ryan Mallon
2012-01-13 8:12 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-01-13 18:05 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-01-11 3:14 ` [PATCH 05/11] ep93xx: Move arch_reset to core.c Ryan Mallon
2012-01-13 17:28 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-01-11 3:14 ` [PATCH 06/11] ep93xx: Don't use system controller defines in audio drivers Ryan Mallon
2012-01-11 17:42 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-11 19:57 ` Ryan Mallon
2012-01-12 3:04 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-13 17:35 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-01-13 21:41 ` Ryan Mallon
2012-01-13 22:13 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-11 3:14 ` [PATCH 07/11] ep93xx: Make syscon access functions private to SoC Ryan Mallon
2012-01-13 17:38 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-01-13 21:43 ` Ryan Mallon
2012-01-11 3:14 ` [PATCH 08/11] ep93xx: Move EP93XX_WATCHDOG_BASE define to driver Ryan Mallon
2012-01-13 17:45 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-01-13 21:46 ` Ryan Mallon
2012-01-13 22:48 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-01-11 3:14 ` [PATCH 09/11] ep93xx: Move crunch code to mach-ep93xx directory Ryan Mallon
2012-01-13 17:51 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-01-13 21:16 ` Ryan Mallon [this message]
2012-01-13 21:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-11 3:14 ` [PATCH 10/11] ep93xx: Move EP93XX_SYSCON defines to SoC private header Ryan Mallon
2012-01-13 17:52 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-01-11 3:14 ` [PATCH 11/11] ep93xx: Remove unnecessary includes of ep93xx-regs.h Ryan Mallon
2012-01-13 17:54 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-01-12 0:17 ` [PATCH 00/11] ep93xx: Move SoC private bits to core Ryan Mallon
2012-01-13 17:56 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-01-14 19:07 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-01-16 4:51 ` Ryan Mallon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F109F45.9020105@gmail.com \
--to=rmallon@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).