From: rmallon@gmail.com (Ryan Mallon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] at91 : implement the standby function for pm/cpuidle
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:08:40 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F1742E8.8090108@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1326843620-13148-5-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
On 18/01/12 10:40, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> This patch groups the self-refresh on/cpu_do_idle/self-refresh off into
> a single 'standby' function.
>
> The standby routine for rm9200 has been turned into an asm routine to have
> a better control of the self refresh and to prevent a memory access when
> running this code.
>
> Draining the write buffer is done automatically when switching for the self
> refresh on sam9, so the instruction is added to the rm9200 only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
I don't think is an improvement. Russell's suggestion was to convert the
pm operations into a structure, like:
struct at91_pm_ops {
u32 (*sdram_selfrefresh_enable)(void);
void (*sdram_selfrefresh_disable)(u32 saved_lpr);
};
This structure should be integrated into soc.h. Note that at91_init_soc
is __initdata, so you can't use that directly, but the basic principle
is the same.
>From there, move the pm functions for each platform to their respective
core file. For example, move the at91rm9200 functions to at91rm9200.c,
something like this:
#ifdef CONFIG_PM
static u32 at91rm9200_sdram_selfrefresh_enable(void)
{
u32 saved_lpr = at91_sys_read(AT91_SDRAMC_LPR);
at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, 0);
at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1);
return saved_lpr;
}
static void at91rm9200_sdram_selfrefresh_disable(u32 saved_lpr)
{
at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, saved_lpr);
}
static struct at91_pm_ops at91rm9200_pm_ops = {
.sdram_selfrefresh_enable = at91rm9200_selfrefresh_enable,
.sdram_selfrefresh_disable = at91rm9200_selfrefresh_disable,
};
#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
Then register at91rm9200_pm_ops structure some way similar to how the
at91_init_soc is done. This will mean that the pm ops for all of the
at91 platforms can be compiled into a single kernel without all of the
ifdef crud.
Thanks,
~Ryan
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c | 11 ++-----
> arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 12 +-------
> arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
> index a851e6c..555d956 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c
> @@ -39,20 +39,15 @@ static int at91_enter_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> {
> struct timeval before, after;
> int idle_time;
> - u32 saved_lpr;
>
> local_irq_disable();
> do_gettimeofday(&before);
> if (index == 0)
> /* Wait for interrupt state */
> cpu_do_idle();
> - else if (index == 1) {
> - asm("b 1f; .align 5; 1:");
> - asm("mcr p15, 0, r0, c7, c10, 4"); /* drain write buffer */
> - saved_lpr = sdram_selfrefresh_enable();
> - cpu_do_idle();
> - sdram_selfrefresh_disable(saved_lpr);
> - }
> + else if (index == 1)
> + at91_standby();
> +
> do_gettimeofday(&after);
> local_irq_enable();
> idle_time = (after.tv_sec - before.tv_sec) * USEC_PER_SEC +
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> index acf32c7..94acc12 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> @@ -208,7 +208,6 @@ extern u32 at91_slow_clock_sz;
>
> static int at91_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
> {
> - u32 saved_lpr;
> at91_gpio_suspend();
> at91_irq_suspend();
>
> @@ -264,16 +263,7 @@ static int at91_pm_enter(suspend_state_t state)
> * For ARM 926 based chips, this requirement is weaker
> * as at91sam9 can access a RAM in self-refresh mode.
> */
> - asm volatile ( "mov r0, #0\n\t"
> - "b 1f\n\t"
> - ".align 5\n\t"
> - "1: mcr p15, 0, r0, c7, c10, 4\n\t"
> - : /* no output */
> - : /* no input */
> - : "r0");
> - saved_lpr = sdram_selfrefresh_enable();
> - cpu_do_idle();
> - sdram_selfrefresh_disable(saved_lpr);
> + at91_standby();
> break;
>
> case PM_SUSPEND_ON:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h
> index 624c99c..b451822 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.h
> @@ -24,22 +24,31 @@
> * still in self-refresh is "not recommended", but seems to work.
> */
>
> -static inline u32 sdram_selfrefresh_enable(void)
> +static inline void at91rm9200_standby(void)
> {
> - u32 saved_lpr = at91_sys_read(AT91_SDRAMC_LPR);
>
> - at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, 0);
> - at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_SRR, 1);
> - return saved_lpr;
> + u32 lpr = at91_sys_read(AT91_SDRAMC_LPR);
> +
> + asm volatile(
> + "b 1f\n\t"
> + ".align 5\n\t"
> + "1: mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 4\n\t"
> + " str %0, [%1, %2]\n\t"
> + " str %3, [%1, %4]\n\t"
> + " mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c0, 4\n\t"
> + " str %5, [%1, %2]"
> + :
> + : "r" (0), "r" (AT91_BASE_SYS), "r" (AT91_SDRAMC_LPR),
> + "r" (1), "r" (AT91_SDRAMC_SRR),
> + "r" (lpr));
> }
>
> -#define sdram_selfrefresh_disable(saved_lpr) \
> - at91_sys_write(AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, saved_lpr)
> +#define at91_standby at91rm9200_standby
>
> #elif defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91CAP9)
> #include <mach/at91cap9_ddrsdr.h>
>
> -static inline u32 sdram_selfrefresh_enable(void)
> +static inline void at91cap9_standby(void)
> {
> u32 saved_lpr, lpr;
>
> @@ -48,11 +57,13 @@ static inline u32 sdram_selfrefresh_enable(void)
> lpr = saved_lpr & ~AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB;
> at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, lpr |
> AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB_SELF_REFRESH);
> - return saved_lpr;
> +
> + cpu_do_idle();
> +
> + at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, saved_lpr);
> }
>
> -#define sdram_selfrefresh_disable(saved_lpr) \
> - at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, saved_lpr)
> +#define at91_standby at91cap9_standby
>
> #elif defined(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91SAM9G45)
> #include <mach/at91sam9_ddrsdr.h>
> @@ -60,14 +71,12 @@ static inline u32 sdram_selfrefresh_enable(void)
> /* We manage both DDRAM/SDRAM controllers, we need more than one value to
> * remember.
> */
> -static u32 saved_lpr1;
> -
> -static inline u32 sdram_selfrefresh_enable(void)
> +static inline void at91sam9g45_standby(void)
> {
> - /* Those tow values allow us to delay self-refresh activation
> + /* Those two values allow us to delay self-refresh activation
> * to the maximum. */
> u32 lpr0, lpr1;
> - u32 saved_lpr0;
> + u32 saved_lpr0, saved_lpr1;
>
> saved_lpr1 = at91_ramc_read(1, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR);
> lpr1 = saved_lpr1 & ~AT91_DDRSDRC_LPCB;
> @@ -81,14 +90,13 @@ static inline u32 sdram_selfrefresh_enable(void)
> at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, lpr0);
> at91_ramc_write(1, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, lpr1);
>
> - return saved_lpr0;
> + cpu_do_idle();
> +
> + at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, saved_lpr0);
> + at91_ramc_write(1, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, saved_lpr1);
> }
>
> -#define sdram_selfrefresh_disable(saved_lpr0) \
> - do { \
> - at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, saved_lpr0); \
> - at91_ramc_write(1, AT91_DDRSDRC_LPR, saved_lpr1); \
> - } while (0)
> +#define at91_standby at91sam9g45_standby
>
> #else
> #include <mach/at91sam9_sdramc.h>
> @@ -101,7 +109,7 @@ static inline u32 sdram_selfrefresh_enable(void)
> #warning Assuming EB1 SDRAM controller is *NOT* used
> #endif
>
> -static inline u32 sdram_selfrefresh_enable(void)
> +static inline void at91sam9_standby(void)
> {
> u32 saved_lpr, lpr;
>
> @@ -110,11 +118,13 @@ static inline u32 sdram_selfrefresh_enable(void)
> lpr = saved_lpr & ~AT91_SDRAMC_LPCB;
> at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, lpr |
> AT91_SDRAMC_LPCB_SELF_REFRESH);
> - return saved_lpr;
> -}
>
> -#define sdram_selfrefresh_disable(saved_lpr) \
> + cpu_do_idle();
> +
> at91_ramc_write(0, AT91_SDRAMC_LPR, saved_lpr)
> +}
> +
> +#define at91_standby at91sam9_standby
>
> #endif
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-18 22:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-17 23:40 [PATCH 0/4] at91 : cleanup pm.h Daniel Lezcano
2012-01-17 23:40 ` [PATCH 1/4] at91 : coding style fixes Daniel Lezcano
2012-01-17 23:40 ` [PATCH 2/4] at91 : declare header name Daniel Lezcano
2012-01-17 23:40 ` [PATCH 3/4] at91 : remove wait_for_interrupt definition Daniel Lezcano
2012-01-18 21:53 ` Ryan Mallon
2012-01-17 23:40 ` [PATCH 4/4] at91 : implement the standby function for pm/cpuidle Daniel Lezcano
2012-01-18 22:08 ` Ryan Mallon [this message]
2012-01-18 22:18 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-18 22:25 ` Ryan Mallon
2012-01-18 22:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-01-19 9:18 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-01-19 9:25 ` [PATCH 0/4] at91 : cleanup pm.h Nicolas Ferre
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-01-24 23:56 [PATCH 1/4] at91 : coding style fixes Daniel Lezcano
2012-01-24 23:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] at91 : implement the standby function for pm/cpuidle Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F1742E8.8090108@gmail.com \
--to=rmallon@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).