From: hs@denx.de (Heiko Schocher)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 6/7] ARM: mtd: nand: davinci: add OF support for davinci nand controller
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:23:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F1E5C82.60108@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F1DF465.60206@freescale.com>
Hello Scott,
Scott Wood wrote:
> On 01/23/2012 02:56 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/davinci/nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/davinci/nand.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..7e8d6db
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/davinci/nand.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
>> +* Texas Instruments Davinci NAND
>> +
>> +This file provides information, what the device node for the
>> +davinci nand interface contain.
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: "ti,davinci-nand";
>> +- reg : contain 2 offset/length values:
>> + - offset and length for the access window
>> + - offset and length for accessing the aemif control registers
>> +- id: id of the controller
>
> What does "id of the controller" mean, specfically? From this I can't
> even tell if it's a number or a string, much less how to use it
> semantically. If it's just a "match what's in the manual" thing,
> perhaps an alias would be better here. Or, if it's a value with a
> specific meaning (e.g. that you need to program into a register) use a
> more specific name.
Ok, fix this. Id means here, which chipselect the controller uses.
Maybe it is better to rename it to "chipselect" ?
>> +Recommended properties :
>> +- mask_ale: mask for ale
>> +- mask_cle: mask for cle
>> +- mask_chipsel: mask for chipselect
>> +- ecc_mode: ECC mode, see NAND_ECC_* defines
>> +- ecc_bits: used ECC bits
>> +- options: nand options, defined in
>> + include/linux/mtd/nand.h, grep for NAND_NO_AUTOINCR
>> +- bbt_options: NAND_BBT_* defines
>
> Binding-specific properties should have a vendor prefix. Dashes are
> preferred to underscores.
You think something like that:
davinci-mask-ale
davinci-mask-cle
...
?
> Don't specify Linux internals by reference -- they could change and
> invalidate existing device trees and non-Linux code that accepts them
> (e.g. U-Boot). If you want them to line up, copy the definition here,
> and if Linux changes, write glue code to convert. It would probably be
> better to define specific properties for anything that must be specified
> here (neither deteted dynamically nor defined by compatible =
> "ti,davinci-nand").
Ok, I add the defines here, and add also a comment in the dts.
> Do all of these properties really belong here? I can see providing some
I think so, because this values come from existing platform code
(grep for struct davinci_nand_pdata)
> information about ECC or BBT mode, if there are multiple conventions
> already in use (or that are reasonably justifiable for different
> situations), as that must agree with how the flash has already been
> programmed. How much of the rest can vary from one "ti,davinci-nand" to
> another? Maybe it's obvious to someone more familiar with davinci, but
> what does "mask for ale/cle/chipselect" mean?
I mapped here just the existing platform code (=struct davinci_nand_pdata)
to OF, so existing boards can easy switch to OF.
Comment in arch/arm/mach-davinci/include/mach/nand.h says for
mask_ale and mask_cle:
/* NOTE: boards don't need to use these address bits
* for ALE/CLE unless they support booting from NAND.
* They're used unless platform data overrides them.
*/
It is used for addressing the ALE/CLE Signals through the address,
used on the arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm646x-evm.c and
arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-tnetv107x-evm.c board ... so I think,
this should be also be setupable through OF ...
>> + nandflash at 3,0 {
>
> PowerPC's ePAPR document -- not directly relevant to ARM, but contains a
> more recently updated list of generic names than the IEEE1275
> recommended pratice -- specifies "flash@". If you don't want to do
> that, "nand@" is used in many existing trees. Why introduce a new name?
There is no reason for that, change this to "nand@".
Thanks for the review.
bye,
Heiko
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-24 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-23 8:56 [RFC PATCH 0/7] ARM: davinci: add support for the am1808 based enbw_cmc board Heiko Schocher
2012-01-23 8:56 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] ARM: davinci, intc: Add OF support for TI interrupt controller Heiko Schocher
2012-02-02 4:54 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-06 6:36 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-02-14 7:15 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-01-23 8:56 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7 v2] ARM: davinci: configure davinci aemif chipselects through OF Heiko Schocher
2012-01-23 8:56 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] ARM: davinci: mux: add OF support Heiko Schocher
2012-01-23 8:56 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] ARM: davinci: net: davinci_emac: " Heiko Schocher
2012-01-23 19:20 ` Anatoly Sivov
2012-01-24 6:14 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-01-30 20:22 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-31 11:27 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-02-02 0:19 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-23 8:56 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] ARM: davinci: i2c: " Heiko Schocher
2012-01-23 20:35 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-01-24 7:18 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-01-24 9:51 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-01-30 20:13 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-31 7:31 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-02-05 20:44 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2012-01-30 20:04 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-31 7:14 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-02-13 23:37 ` Ben Dooks
2012-02-14 7:16 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-01-23 8:56 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] ARM: mtd: nand: davinci: add OF support for davinci nand controller Heiko Schocher
2012-01-23 23:59 ` Scott Wood
2012-01-24 7:23 ` Heiko Schocher [this message]
2012-01-24 19:45 ` Scott Wood
2012-01-25 7:09 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-01-26 20:33 ` Scott Wood
2012-01-27 6:40 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-01-27 17:02 ` Scott Wood
2012-01-23 8:56 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] ARM: davinci: add support for the am1808 based enbw_cmc board Heiko Schocher
2012-01-30 20:32 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-31 13:04 ` Heiko Schocher
2012-02-01 10:20 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-02-02 0:17 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F1E5C82.60108@denx.de \
--to=hs@denx.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).