From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 08:44:19 -0600
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/2] gpio: pl061: enable interrupts with DT style
 binding
In-Reply-To: <20120131143609.GA26436@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
References: <1327944699-29882-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com>
 <1327944699-29882-3-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com>
 <20120131143609.GA26436@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Message-ID: <4F27FE43.7090503@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 01/31/2012 08:36 AM, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 11:31:39AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> ...
>> -static void __init pl061_init_gc(struct pl061_gpio *chip, int irq_base)
>> +static void __init pl061_init_gc(struct pl061_gpio *chip,
>> +				 struct device_node *node, int irq_base)
>>  {
>>  	struct irq_chip_type *ct;
>>  
>> @@ -212,15 +212,17 @@ static void __init pl061_init_gc(struct pl061_gpio *chip, int irq_base)
>>  	ct->chip.irq_set_wake = irq_gc_set_wake;
>>  	ct->regs.mask = GPIOIE;
>>  
>> -	irq_setup_generic_chip(chip->irq_gc, IRQ_MSK(PL061_GPIO_NR),
>> -			       IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK, IRQ_NOREQUEST, 0);
>> +	irq_setup_generic_chip_domain(chip->irq_gc, node,
>> +				      IRQ_MSK(PL061_GPIO_NR),
>> +				      IRQ_GC_INIT_NESTED_LOCK,
>> +				      IRQ_NOREQUEST, 0);
>>  }
> 
> The function irq_setup_generic_chip_domain() is wrapped by
> #ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN in patch #1.  Is it true that pl061 driver
> will never work with !IRQ_DOMAIN case?

You're right unless Grant thinks IRQ_DOMAIN should always be enabled for
ARM? Otherwise, I'll add something like this for !IRQ_DOMAIN:

static inline void irq_setup_generic_chip_domain(
			   struct irq_chip_generic *gc,
                           struct device_node *node, u32 msk,
                           enum irq_gc_flags flags, unsigned int clr,
                           unsigned int set)
{
	irq_setup_generic_chip(gc, msk, flags, clr, set);
}

Rob