From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kumarrav@codeaurora.org (Ravi Kumar V)
Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 11:46:02 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add Qualcomm MSM ADM DMAEngine driver
In-Reply-To: <1327990151.1527.80.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
References: <1325854052-21402-1-git-send-email-kumarrav@codeaurora.org>
 <1326807902.1540.116.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <4F195E4C.6080805@codeaurora.org>
 <1327066287.517.4.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <4F1D4052.3070701@codeaurora.org>
 <1327326713.517.32.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <4F1FFF7E.3000802@codeaurora.org>
 <1327911315.1527.8.camel@vkoul-udesk3> <4F278341.4020600@codeaurora.org>
 <1327990151.1527.80.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Message-ID: <4F28D8A2.9050605@codeaurora.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 1/31/2012 11:39 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 11:29 +0530, Ravi Kumar V wrote:
>>> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/24/275
>>> [2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/26/405
>>>
>>
>> Yes if we follow the above RFC and add extra context parameter also
>> in
>> device_prep_dma_sg()&  device_prep_interleaved_dma() then it supports
>> our hardware and our work will be completed.
>>
>> can we follow above RFC and implement our driver.
>> Is above RFC finalized and included in mainline?
> Alexandre will post an updated one soon, but the idea is same
>

Can we add extra parameter context to device_prep_dma_sg() & 
device_prep_interleaved_dma() API's and implement our driver.

-- 
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.