From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ux500 : decouple/recouple gic from the PRCMU
Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:47:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F304A6A.9070703@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdaW+xBNvEjXe3sYxWq379Gk3HkX66YKe=mWKJMKFercyw@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/06/2012 06:37 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 02/06/2012 10:19 AM, Rickard Andersson wrote:
>
>>> - there is no reason to place these functions inside the db8500-prcmu.c
>>> file. There is so much stuff in the PRCMU register base so we can not
>>> have everything in one file. Why not have it as it is?
>>
>> Why spread the prcmu code when it is related to the prcmu ?
>>
>> Linus ? What do you think ?
>
> I have no strong opinions on this. When I discussed it with Mattias
> who wrote much of the driver we concluded that the PRCMU drivers needs
> a lot of shaping up. Mainly it may need to be split into two parts: one
> which is a "pure" MFD device (register access part) one MFD firmware
> interaction part, and then a platform-specific (U8500) part.
>
> This would help getting code in more logical places.
>
> For now I would suggest not moving stuff around, I thin Mattias is onto
> cleaning up the structure as per above and we could be messing it up
> for him, which is not good.
Ok, I will resend the patch with the name changed to decouple/recouple.
Is the patch acceptable as it is ?
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 21:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-03 12:07 [PATCH] ux500 : decouple/recouple gic from the PRCMU Daniel Lezcano
2012-02-06 9:19 ` Rickard Andersson
2012-02-06 14:10 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-02-06 17:37 ` Linus Walleij
2012-02-06 21:47 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2012-02-07 8:39 ` Rickard Andersson
2012-02-07 9:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-02-07 9:57 ` Rickard Andersson
2012-02-07 14:15 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-02-07 15:25 ` Vincent Guittot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F304A6A.9070703@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).