From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nils.faerber@kernelconcepts.de (Nils Faerber) Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:01:02 +0100 Subject: Kirkwood, kernel 3.2, vmalloc region overlap, not starting up In-Reply-To: <20120207165158.GD889@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20120207152903.GA16238@lunn.ch> <4F314D0C.50501@kernelconcepts.de> <20120207161838.GF15165@lunn.ch> <20120207165158.GD889@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <4F3158CE.6020507@kernelconcepts.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am 07.02.2012 17:51, schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 05:18:38PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>> Apart from my joy - the basic reason for that change would be still >>> interesting? Does this only apply to Kirwoods or my special board? >> >> I think the conversation fizzled out without coming to a conclusion >> what is wrong. Look back in the archives and see what you can find. >> The problem hits kirkwood, but i don't know if it also affects other >> Orion based processors. u-boot also play a role in the problem... > > I think what's going on (what's suggested by the uboot patch) is that > uboot leaves the L2 cache enabled, and then passes control over to > the kernel decompressor. > > The kernel decompressor starts, and enables the L1 cache. This > unexpectedly enables the L2 cache as well. However, the decompressor > is not L2 cache aware, and only cleans the L1 cache. > > The decompressor finishes, flushes the L1 cache, and disables the L1 > cache (and, because of the way things work, disables the dirty L2 > cache.) > > We're now in the situation where the kernel text/data may or may not > be in RAM, and therefore may or may not be executable. > > I don't think that's Nils problem. > > But why you've both identified that turning off the V2P stuff fixes it, > I'm not sure. It needs debugging (it needs me or someone else to cook > up a patch to get some information out of - explicitly - Nils system) > so that we can work out what's going on there. > > The theory is, the V2P stuff should be able to calculate the physical > offset irrespective of the kernel placement, and so having it enabled > should be totally transparent. Obviously, something is going wrong. > As yet we don't know what's causing Nils problem. > > If no one gets there before me, then I'll post a patch for Nils to run > with to get some information from his kernel sometime in the next few > days, assuming these messages don't get too buried and I don't forget. If you have anything for me to try I will gladly do it, no problem! The same issue should also hit most of the other Kirkwood based systems so finding a fix for my TK71 should also resolve issues on quite some other boards. Cheers nils -- kernel concepts GbR Tel: +49-271-771091-12 Sieghuetter Hauptweg 48 Fax: +49-271-771091-19 D-57072 Siegen Mob: +49-176-21024535 http://www.kernelconcepts.de