From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/15] ARM: make mach/io.h include optional
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:36:08 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3A7158.2080702@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201202140804.49026.arnd@arndb.de>
On 02/14/2012 02:04 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 February 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Arnd,
>>
>> On 02/13/2012 08:03 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Monday 13 February 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 03:43:26PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>>>>> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Add a kconfig option NEED_MACH_IO_H to conditionally include mach/io.h.
>>>>>
>>>>> Basing this on CONFIG_PCI and CONFIG_ISA doesn't quite work. Most ISA
>>>>> platforms don't need mach/io.h, but ebsa110 does.
>>>>
>>>> This is architecturally wrong. If you have ISA, and your __io() macro
>>>> is essentially a 1:1 translation, you're asking for ISA drivers to
>>>> scribble on whatever is at virtual address 0-64K. Too bad if that
>>>> happens to be where your CPU vectors are stored, you'll lose control
>>>> of the CPU in that case.
>>>
>>> Right. I still think it should be conditional on PCI || ISA || PCMCIA,
>>> not introducing a new kconfig symbol, and the next step should be to
>>> unify the __io() implementations for the platforms that need them.
>>
>> As we discussed at Connect, that was my original intent. However, there
>> are a couple of issues as NEED_MACH_IO_H is not exactly equivalent to
>> PCI || ISA || PCMCIA.
>>
>> There are a few platforms which still need io.h for custom accessor
>> functions: rpc, ixp4xx, s3c2410, and ebsa110.
>
> I've tried to interpret what is there, please correct me if this is wrong:
>
> RPC and ebsa110 have ISA, or some twisted version of that. I believe
> RPC doesn't select CONFIG_ISA because it has no actual ISA slots but
> it still uses legacy ISA I/O and we might just select it anyway.
>
> s3c24xx seems to have ISA in a similar way on the "bast" machine,
> while the setup code for that got copied into some platforms that
> don't really require it.
>
> ixp4xx has PCI, but does not always use direct MMIO to access the
> memory or I/O spaces.
>
> I guess the only way we can ever make these ones use a common header
> file (in case we care) by letting them go through an indirect
> struct io_ops { u8 (*inb)(int); void (*outb)(u8, int); ... };,
> but we might not care enough.
>
>> Also, a few platforms that
>> only select ISA don't do any translation in __io(). These are sa1100,
>> clps711x, and pxa. My understanding is that is wrong.
>
> sa1100 has pcmcia slots that use their own method (setting io_offset)
> of redirecting the i/o space into the right location. As Russell
> mentioned, this is broken if you load an ISA device driver that
> uses hardcoded port numbers, or as I might add when you use /dev/port.
>
> pxa seems to do the same as sa1100 for PCMCIA and PCI, but I can't figure
> out what they do for ISA. I suspect they only enable that in order to
> get ISA device drivers for PCMCIA based add-on cards.
>
> clps711x for all I can tell is broken as you say.
>
> I think omap1 and at91 fit into the same category as sa1100 and pxa
> regarding pcmcia. All four can in theory be converted to use a
> common virtual mapping as we want to have for PCI.
>
>> If we use CONFIG_PCI, then we have to move over all PCI enabled
>> platforms at once. With a separate kconfig option, then we can move
>> platforms one by one. Some are legacy and we may not want to move. This
>> also helped with omap, but Tony has now fixed it.
>
> We could also generalize the implementation from tegra, which seems
> reasonable as a start:
>
>
> #define IO_SPACE_LIMIT 0xffff
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_ISA) || defined(CONFIG_PCCARD)
> #include <mach/io.h>
> #elif defined(CONFIG_PCI)
> extern void __iomem *pci_io_base;
>
> static inline void __iomem *__io(unsigned long addr)
> {
> return pci_io_base + (addr & IO_SPACE_LIMIT);
But don't we want a constant pci_io_base? This would certainly be a
quicker conversion, but I don't think we want to do it twice.
> }
> #else
> static inline void __iomem *__io(unsigned long addr)
> {
> return NULL;
> }
> #endif
> #define __io(a) __io(a)
>
> Out of the platforms supporting PCI right now, we currently have these three classes:
>
> 1. portable, but using different virtual addresses:
> arch/arm/mach-integrator/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(a) ((void __iomem *)(PCI_IO_VADDR + (a)))
> arch/arm/mach-ixp23xx/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(p) ((void __iomem*)((p) + IXP23XX_PCI_IO_VIRT))
> arch/arm/mach-ixp2000/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(p) ((void __iomem *)((p)+IXP2000_PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE))
> arch/arm/mach-shark/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(a) ((void __iomem *)(0xe0000000 + (a)))
> arch/arm/mach-footbridge/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(a) ((void __iomem *)(PCIO_BASE + (a)))
> arch/arm/mach-tegra/include/mach/io.h:static inline void __iomem *__io(unsigned long addr)
> arch/arm/mach-kirkwood/include/mach/io.h:static inline void __iomem *__io(unsigned long addr)
> arch/arm/mach-dove/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(a) ((void __iomem *)(((a) - DOVE_PCIE0_IO_BUS_BASE) + \
>
> 2. Does not map the I/O space, or does not use it -- I cannot see how
> any of these use PIO based PCI devices at all, probably broken already:
> arch/arm/mach-cns3xxx/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(a) __typesafe_io(a)
> arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(v) __typesafe_io(v)
> arch/arm/mach-ks8695/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(a) __typesafe_io(a)
> arch/arm/mach-orion5x/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(a) __typesafe_io(a)
> arch/arm/mach-sa1100/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(a) __typesafe_io(a)
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(a) __typesafe_io(a)
> arch/arm/mach-versatile/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(a) __typesafe_io(a)
>
> 3. scary multi-way translation, needs someone to really understand (Nico?, Lennert?)
> arch/arm/mach-iop32x/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(p) ((void __iomem *)IOP3XX_PCI_IO_PHYS_TO_VIRT(p))
> arch/arm/mach-iop33x/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(p) ((void __iomem *)IOP3XX_PCI_IO_PHYS_TO_VIRT(p))
> arch/arm/mach-iop13xx/include/mach/io.h:#define __io(a) __iop13xx_io(a)
> arch/arm/mach-mv78xx0/include/mach/io.h:static inline void __iomem *__io(unsigned long addr)
>
> I think if we can figure out the third category, this should all become
> fairly easy for PCI based platforms.
>
This looks correct AFAICT.
We could just call the 3rd category legacy and move on.
Rob
>
> Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-14 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-13 21:43 [PATCH 00/15] mach/io.h cleanup and removal Rob Herring
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 01/15] usb: ohci-pxa27x: add explicit include of hardware.h Rob Herring
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 02/15] ARM: add explicit include of system.h to processor.h Rob Herring
2012-02-13 22:14 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 03/15] ARM: provide runtime hook for ioremap Rob Herring
2012-02-13 22:13 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-02-13 22:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-13 22:48 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 04/15] ARM: imx: convert to common runtime ioremap hook Rob Herring
2012-02-16 0:17 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 05/15] ARM: msm: use " Rob Herring
2012-02-13 23:05 ` David Brown
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 06/15] ARM: msm: clean-up mach/io.h Rob Herring
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 07/15] ARM: at91: " Rob Herring
2012-02-14 9:21 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-02-14 13:24 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-16 7:43 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-02-16 14:08 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-16 14:23 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-02-23 17:26 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-02-27 16:55 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-27 17:27 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 08/15] ARM: davinci: remove unneeded mach/io.h include Rob Herring
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 09/15] ARM: orion5x: clean-up mach/io.h Rob Herring
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 10/15] ARM: tegra: " Rob Herring
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 11/15] ARM: ep93xx: " Rob Herring
2012-02-13 21:52 ` Ryan Mallon
2012-02-13 22:15 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-13 22:16 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-02-27 15:17 ` [PATCH] " Rob Herring
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 12/15] ARM: clps711x: remove unneeded include of mach/io.h Rob Herring
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 13/15] ARM: make mach/io.h include optional Rob Herring
2012-02-13 22:14 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-02-13 22:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-13 22:55 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-14 2:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-14 2:54 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-14 8:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-14 14:36 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2012-02-14 17:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-14 17:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-14 18:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-14 23:09 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-14 23:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-15 0:25 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-02-15 14:14 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-15 0:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-27 19:31 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-28 16:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-27 22:31 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-28 16:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-13 23:15 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-02-14 1:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-14 17:38 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-02-14 18:20 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 14/15] ARM: remove bunch of now unused mach/io.h files Rob Herring
2012-02-13 22:16 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-02-16 0:19 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-16 18:57 ` Linus Walleij
2012-02-13 21:43 ` [PATCH 15/15] ARM: kill off __mem_pci Rob Herring
2012-02-13 22:22 ` [PATCH 00/15] mach/io.h cleanup and removal Tony Lindgren
2012-02-13 23:56 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-14 3:09 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-13 23:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-14 3:20 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-14 17:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-14 17:57 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-14 18:28 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-02-14 19:41 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-14 20:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-14 21:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-14 21:54 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-14 22:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-21 22:47 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F3A7158.2080702@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).