From: rmallon@gmail.com (Ryan Mallon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: protect usage of cr_alignment by #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:28:29 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F3D9F2D.2090209@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329423490-15580-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
On 17/02/12 07:18, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/system.h | 2 ++
> arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S | 4 ++++
> arch/arm/kernel/head-common.S | 10 ++++++++--
> arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 8 ++++++--
> arch/arm/mm/alignment.c | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 8 +++++++-
> 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Hi Uwe,
Couple of points below,
Thanks,
~Ryan
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
> index e4c96cc..de46477 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/system.h
> @@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ extern unsigned int user_debug;
> #define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; smp_mb(); } while (0)
> #define nop() __asm__ __volatile__("mov\tr0,r0\t@ nop\n\t");
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
> extern unsigned long cr_no_alignment; /* defined in entry-armv.S */
> extern unsigned long cr_alignment; /* defined in entry-armv.S */
>
> @@ -224,6 +225,7 @@ static inline void set_copro_access(unsigned int val)
> : : "r" (val) : "cc");
> isb();
> }
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * switch_mm() may do a full cache flush over the context switch,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> index be16a48..a6f2ef5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/entry-armv.S
> @@ -314,8 +314,10 @@ __pabt_svc:
> ENDPROC(__pabt_svc)
>
> .align 5
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
> .LCcralign:
> .word cr_alignment
> +#endif
> #ifdef MULTI_DABORT
> .LCprocfns:
> .word processor
> @@ -1146,12 +1148,14 @@ __vectors_end:
>
> .data
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
> .globl cr_alignment
> .globl cr_no_alignment
> cr_alignment:
> .space 4
> cr_no_alignment:
> .space 4
> +#endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER
> .globl handle_arch_irq
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/head-common.S b/arch/arm/kernel/head-common.S
> index 854bd22..5ca01bb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/head-common.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/head-common.S
> @@ -98,8 +98,10 @@ __mmap_switched:
> str r9, [r4] @ Save processor ID
> str r1, [r5] @ Save machine type
> str r2, [r6] @ Save atags pointer
> - bic r4, r0, #CR_A @ Clear 'A' bit
> - stmia r7, {r0, r4} @ Save control register values
> + cmp r7, #0
> + itt ne
> + bicne r4, r0, #CR_A @ Clear 'A' bit
> + stmneia r7, {r0, r4} @ Save control register values
Can the cr_alignment variable ever have a value of zero if CONFIG_CPU_15
is enabled? If so you fail to do the stmnia which is possibly not
correct? Why do the registers not need to be stored if cr_alignment is
zero? I think this at least deserves a comment explaining.
Also, couldn't it just be done like this:
#ifndef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
bic r4, r0, #CR_A
stimia r7, {r0, r4}
#endif
Since r7 will always be zero in the !CP15 case?
> b start_kernel
> ENDPROC(__mmap_switched)
>
> @@ -113,7 +115,11 @@ __mmap_switched_data:
> .long processor_id @ r4
> .long __machine_arch_type @ r5
> .long __atags_pointer @ r6
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
> .long cr_alignment @ r7
> +#else
> + .long 0
> +#endif
> .long init_thread_union + THREAD_START_SP @ sp
> .size __mmap_switched_data, . - __mmap_switched_data
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> index a255c39..50d3df8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/setup.c
> @@ -472,9 +472,13 @@ static void __init setup_processor(void)
> cpu_cache = *list->cache;
> #endif
>
> - printk("CPU: %s [%08x] revision %d (ARMv%s), cr=%08lx\n",
> + printk("CPU: %s [%08x] revision %d (ARMv%s)",
> cpu_name, read_cpuid_id(), read_cpuid_id() & 15,
> - proc_arch[cpu_architecture()], cr_alignment);
> + proc_arch[cpu_architecture()]);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
> + printk(KERN_CONT ", cr=%08lx\n", cr_alignment);
#else
printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
?
> +#endif
>
> snprintf(init_utsname()->machine, __NEW_UTS_LEN + 1, "%s%c",
> list->arch_name, ENDIANNESS);
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c b/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c
> index caf14dc..119d178 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/alignment.c
> @@ -89,7 +89,11 @@ core_param(alignment, ai_usermode, int, 0600);
> /* Return true if and only if the ARMv6 unaligned access model is in use. */
> static bool cpu_is_v6_unaligned(void)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
> return cpu_architecture() >= CPU_ARCH_ARMv6 && (cr_alignment & CR_U);
> +#else
> + return 0;
> +#endif
> }
>
> static int safe_usermode(int new_usermode, bool warn)
> @@ -961,12 +965,14 @@ static int __init alignment_init(void)
> return -ENOMEM;
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
> if (cpu_is_v6_unaligned()) {
> cr_alignment &= ~CR_A;
> cr_no_alignment &= ~CR_A;
> set_cr(cr_alignment);
> ai_usermode = safe_usermode(ai_usermode, false);
> }
> +#endif
>
> hook_fault_code(FAULT_CODE_ALIGNMENT, do_alignment, SIGBUS, BUS_ADRALN,
> "alignment exception");
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index 94c5a0c..f6dbe1a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -109,8 +109,10 @@ static int __init early_cachepolicy(char *p)
>
> if (memcmp(p, cache_policies[i].policy, len) == 0) {
> cachepolicy = i;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
> cr_alignment &= ~cache_policies[i].cr_mask;
> cr_no_alignment &= ~cache_policies[i].cr_mask;
> +#endif
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -128,7 +130,9 @@ static int __init early_cachepolicy(char *p)
> cachepolicy = CPOLICY_WRITEBACK;
> }
> flush_cache_all();
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
> set_cr(cr_alignment);
> +#endif
> return 0;
> }
> early_param("cachepolicy", early_cachepolicy);
> @@ -163,6 +167,7 @@ static int __init early_ecc(char *p)
> early_param("ecc", early_ecc);
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15
> static int __init noalign_setup(char *__unused)
> {
> cr_alignment &= ~CR_A;
> @@ -171,8 +176,9 @@ static int __init noalign_setup(char *__unused)
> return 1;
> }
> __setup("noalign", noalign_setup);
> +#endif
>
> -#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_CPU_CP15)
> void adjust_cr(unsigned long mask, unsigned long set)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-17 0:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-22 11:12 [RFC PATCH 00/11] Cortex-M3 support Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-22 11:13 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] ARM: only show modules in the memory layout for MODULES=y Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-26 6:16 ` Linus Walleij
2012-01-22 11:13 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] ARM: add device tree blobs to .gitignore Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-22 11:13 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] ARM: protect usage of cr_alignment by #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15 Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-23 5:43 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-01-23 8:14 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-22 11:13 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] ARM: Add a printk loglevel modifier Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-23 5:50 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-01-22 11:13 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] ARM: provide XIP_VIRT_ADDR for no-MMU builds Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-22 11:13 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] Cortex-M3: Add base support for Cortex-M3 Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-22 19:45 ` Michał Mirosław
2012-01-22 20:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-22 11:13 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] Cortex-M3: Add support for exception handling Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-22 11:13 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] Cortex-M3: Add NVIC support Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-31 19:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-22 11:13 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] Cortex-M3: Allow the building of Cortex-M3 kernel port Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-22 20:05 ` Michał Mirosław
2012-02-07 19:43 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-22 11:13 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] Cortex-M3: Add VFP support Uwe Kleine-König
2012-01-22 11:13 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] HACK! ARM: no, we don't enter in ARM Uwe Kleine-König
2012-02-07 20:18 ` [RFC PATCH 00/11] Cortex-M3 support Uwe Kleine-König
2012-02-16 20:01 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-02-16 20:18 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: protect usage of cr_alignment by #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_CP15 Uwe Kleine-König
2012-02-16 20:18 ` [PATCH 2/5] ARM: Add a printk loglevel modifier Uwe Kleine-König
2012-02-16 20:18 ` [PATCH 3/5] ARM: force branch instructions to use long distance encoding Uwe Kleine-König
2012-02-16 20:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: Cortex-M3: Add base support for Cortex-M3 Uwe Kleine-König
2012-02-16 20:18 ` [PATCH 5/5] ARM: Cortex-M3: Add support for exception handling Uwe Kleine-König
2012-02-16 22:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-24 22:01 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-02-24 22:12 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-02-24 22:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-25 8:49 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-02-25 14:07 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-03-05 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] Cortex-M3: Add base support for Cortex-M3 Uwe Kleine-König
2012-03-05 17:04 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] Cortex-M3: Add support for exception handling Uwe Kleine-König
2012-03-09 17:10 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-03-13 20:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2012-03-08 10:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] Cortex-M3: Add base support for Cortex-M3 Catalin Marinas
2012-02-17 0:28 ` Ryan Mallon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F3D9F2D.2090209@gmail.com \
--to=rmallon@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).