From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: integrator: convert to sparse irqs
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:37:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4B950F.3020803@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdag3BsubBgTiNM35e97OmjHpzAseEz0WK3oo5rQ5i8S_g@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/27/2012 01:44 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 02/26/2012 03:45 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
>>> <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com> wrote:
>>>> On 18:32 Fri 24 Feb , Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>
>>>>> -#define NR_IRQS 47
>>>>> +#define NR_IRQS_INTEGRATOR_AP 34
>>>>> +#define NR_IRQS_INTEGRATOR_CP 47
>>>>
>>>> why do you need to specified both?
>>>
>>> They are two totally different machines and should never have had that
>>> common roof of NR_IRQS = max(AP,CP), it's just not elegant.
>>>
>>> Maybe I'm a bit pedantic but I want to set the .nr_irqs for each machine so that
>>> it corresponds exactly to what it actually has, instead of using a roof value.
>>> I think it improves readability and understanding.
>>
>> Really, you want to get rid of the value altogether. Each irq_chip
>> should allocate its irq_descs and then you don't need to set .nr_irqs.
>
> OK can you point to a machine that does it the right way and
> I'll fix.
>
> Or do I need the irq domains lib to go in first to do that in a
> good/non-awkward way?
>
You just need something like this. It doesn't really need a domain until
DT support is done and this will still be needed in the non-DT case.
Rob
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-versatile/fpga-irq.c
b/arch/arm/plat-versatile/fpga-irq.c
index f0cc8e1..3e66b20 100644
--- a/arch/arm/plat-versatile/fpga-irq.c
+++ b/arch/arm/plat-versatile/fpga-irq.c
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ static void fpga_irq_handle(unsigned int irq, struct
irq_desc *desc)
void __init fpga_irq_init(int parent_irq, u32 valid, struct
fpga_irq_data *f)
{
unsigned int i;
+ int irq_cnt = fls(valid);
f->chip.irq_ack = fpga_irq_mask;
f->chip.irq_mask = fpga_irq_mask;
@@ -59,7 +60,9 @@ void __init fpga_irq_init(int parent_irq, u32 valid,
struct fpga_irq_data *f)
irq_set_chained_handler(parent_irq, fpga_irq_handle);
}
- for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
+ irq_alloc_descs(f->irq_start, 0, irq_cnt, numa_node_id());
+
+ for (i = 0; i < irq_cnt; i++) {
if (valid & (1 << i)) {
unsigned int irq = f->irq_start + i;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-27 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-24 17:32 [PATCH] ARM: integrator: convert to sparse irqs Linus Walleij
2012-02-24 19:04 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-24 19:15 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2012-02-26 9:45 ` Linus Walleij
2012-02-27 3:42 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-27 7:44 ` Linus Walleij
2012-02-27 14:37 ` Rob Herring [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F4B950F.3020803@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).