From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:24:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F4C028E.2000405@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6vU2dSpRrqd2y=ssgVsWuwpuvFtja9YcUAQA_ETWcwCYg@mail.gmail.com>
On 2/27/2012 11:17 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Cousson, Benoit<b-cousson@ti.com> wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>>
>> On 2/27/2012 2:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 06:01:20PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>>
>>>> Depending on what order Mark happens to pull them in, I am fine
>>>> re-sending adding support for the 2 twl6030 fixed regulators.
>>>
>>>
>>> Please can you guys come up with a single unified series for this stuff
>>> - I'll hold off on applying anything to allow you to do this.
>>
>>
>> The issue is that the initial TWL regulator series from Rajendra will depend
>> on the twl core DT support I have that depends on the irq_domain series from
>> Grant...
>
> If it depends on the irqdomain tree, then just merge that tree into
> yours. That tree is stable now for exactly that reason. You can rely
> on it.
I've just posted a pull request [1] to Tony that will merge your series
into an OMAP DT branch to be a base for further OMAP DT series.
Regards,
Benoit
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg65346.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-27 22:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-27 10:35 [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] regulator: twl: adapt twl-regulator driver to dt Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 10:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] arm/dts: twl: Pass regulator data from dt Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 12:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Device tree support for TWL regulators Peter Ujfalusi
2012-02-27 12:31 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-27 13:41 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-27 13:52 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-27 14:03 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-27 14:21 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-27 14:53 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-28 5:41 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-02-28 10:18 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-27 22:17 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-27 22:24 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-02-23 11:35 Rajendra Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F4C028E.2000405@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).