From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rmallon@gmail.com (Ryan Mallon)
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:53:48 +1100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: Add Kconfig option to use mkimage -T
 kernel_noload
In-Reply-To: <20120229194409.GO14173@pengutronix.de>
References: <1330473804-23348-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com>
 <20120229122942.GF3318@game.jcrosoft.org>
 <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF17BDDF206A@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
 <20120229181430.GI3318@game.jcrosoft.org> <4F4E6F96.8080907@am.sony.com>
 <20120229191209.GN14173@pengutronix.de>
 <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF17BDDF2122@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
 <20120229194409.GO14173@pengutronix.de>
Message-ID: <4F4EBA8C.1040408@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 01/03/12 06:44, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:17:41AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote at Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:12 PM:
>>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:33:58AM -0800, Tim Bird wrote:
>>>> On 02/29/2012 10:14 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>>>>> On 08:58 Wed 29 Feb     , Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>>>> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote at Wednesday, February 29, 2012 5:30 AM:
>>>>>>> On 17:03 Tue 28 Feb     , Stephen Warren wrote:

<snip>

>> The existing target works just fine today.
> It depends what you want to achieve. If you want to make everything
> maximally easy for everyone you can optimize the uImage target.
> 
> If you want to give incentive for U-Boot to improve, drop the target
> today. 


This assumes that people will upgrade their bootloaders, which is not
always possible or desirable.

~Ryan