From: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com (Cong Wang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] MM: CMA: add a simple kernel module as the helper to test CMA
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:55:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F56EA49.8070808@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGsJ_4x4CwD+WAE9d+Xob_tfwqmE6SdBdBd5EbC64XBi4Uzvgg@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/07/2012 12:49 PM, Barry Song wrote:
> 2012/3/7 Cong Wang<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>:
>> On 03/07/2012 11:14 AM, Barry Song wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Barry Song<Baohua.Song@csr.com>
>>>
>>> Any write request to /dev/cma_test will let the module to allocate memory
>>> from
>>> CMA, for example:
>>>
>>> 1st time
>>> $ echo 1024> /dev/cma_test
>>> will require cma_test to request 1MB(1024KB)
>>> 2nd time
>>> $ echo 2048> /dev/cma_test
>>> will require cma_test to request 2MB(2048KB)
>>>
>>> Any read request to /dev/cma_test will let the module to free the 1st
>>> valid
>>> memory from CMA, for example:
>>>
>>> 1st time
>>> $ cat /dev/cma_test
>>> will require cma_test to free the 1MB allocated in the first write request
>>> 2nd time
>>> $ cat /dev/cma_test
>>> will require cma_test to free the 2MB allocated in the second write
>>> request
>>
>>
>> Any reason why using /dev not /proc or /sys?
>
> pls note it is just a test module to verify CMA at runtime. it is not
> important either it is /dev, it is /proc or it is /sys.
Why not important? You want it to be merged, don't you?
>
> any way to make things easier, we take that way.
>
Why /dev interface is easier than /proc and /sys? Confused, actually I
think /proc or /sys should be easier...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-07 4:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-07 3:14 [PATCH v3] MM: CMA: add a simple kernel module as the helper to test CMA Barry Song
2012-03-07 4:14 ` Cong Wang
2012-03-07 4:49 ` Barry Song
2012-03-07 4:55 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2012-03-07 4:57 ` Barry Song
2012-03-07 5:01 ` Cong Wang
2012-03-07 5:05 ` Barry Song
2012-03-07 5:09 ` Cong Wang
2012-03-07 5:17 ` Barry Song
2012-03-07 5:22 ` Cong Wang
2012-03-07 5:40 ` Barry Song
2012-03-07 10:38 ` Barry Song
2012-03-07 10:48 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-03-07 10:55 ` Barry Song
2012-03-07 10:59 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2012-03-07 11:12 ` Barry Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F56EA49.8070808@gmail.com \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).