From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com (Cong Wang)
Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 13:09:49 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v3] MM: CMA: add a simple kernel module as the helper
 to test CMA
In-Reply-To: <CAGsJ_4ypegMQVf0Xet1T5sLaaEDGh5s1Vi6w4t_UQSZp7nYQuQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1331090098-25097-1-git-send-email-Barry.Song@csr.com>
 <4F56E0AC.8070501@gmail.com>
 <CAGsJ_4x4CwD+WAE9d+Xob_tfwqmE6SdBdBd5EbC64XBi4Uzvgg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F56EA49.8070808@gmail.com>
 <CAGsJ_4xJoKGt3+b_3bteoMyeO615pCxFpMpsH4LtvufFNDv6bA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F56EBA6.6000704@gmail.com>
 <CAGsJ_4ypegMQVf0Xet1T5sLaaEDGh5s1Vi6w4t_UQSZp7nYQuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F56ED9D.3000504@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 03/07/2012 01:05 PM, Barry Song wrote:
> 2012/3/7 Cong Wang<xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>:
>> On 03/07/2012 12:57 PM, Barry Song wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> if you think so, pls do that and send v4 with your s-o-b.
>>>
>>
>> This is not a good attitude, nor helps your patch to be merged...
>>
>> Be collaborative.
>
> some people like focusing on trivial things. i said i really didn't
> care about the details whether it is /dev, /proc, /sys.
> if you like a /proc, pls do it by yourself and i will agree. but i
> will not waste my time on that.

This is definitely not trivial... What's more, kernel developers *do* 
care about trivial things (trivial at kernel.org).

We are trying to make your patch perfect, you just refused, sigh...