From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kgene.kim@samsung.com (Kukjin Kim) Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 00:00:39 -0800 Subject: [GIT PULL] Samsung Cleanup EXYNOS clock for v3.4 In-Reply-To: <20120310173526.GB5972@quad.lixom.net> References: <4F589474.8050609@samsung.com> <4F5A22AD.1070907@samsung.com> <4F5B74C1.3080200@samsung.com> <20120310173526.GB5972@quad.lixom.net> Message-ID: <4F5C5BA7.8050904@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 03/10/12 09:35, Olof Johansson wrote: [...] > > The contents of the branch itself looks good, but now you have introduced > a modified/delete conflict with yourself. > > You modify arch/arm/mach-exynos/clock.c in your cleanup-use-static branch, and > then you move it here. That means that when I merge in this branch, git throws > a conflict and I have to do manual edits to make the contents match. > > It's better if you base this branch on your cleanup-use-static branch, so that > the move includes those edits. That way there is no conflict resolution to do > at our end either. > > Can you please do that rebase and send a fresh pull request? I'll continue > looking at your other requests meanwhile. > Hi Olof, Sorry for late response. OK I see and your suggestion sounds good to me. Let me send a new pull request after that. Thanks. Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim , Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.