* [GIT PULL] imx irq_domain migration
@ 2012-02-16 15:49 Shawn Guo
2012-02-16 17:50 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2012-02-16 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Rob,
Please pull imx irq_domain support below. It's based on Grant's
irqdomain/next today with your generic-chip series applied on top
of it.
Regards,
Shawn
The following changes since commit 53d7d9ee4c6611b13d9e7c77c02d5e9deed95da5:
gpio: pl061: enable interrupts with DT style binding (2012-02-16 07:07:16 -0800)
are available in the git repository at:
http://git.linaro.org/git/people/shawnguo/linux-2.6.git imx/irqdomain
Shawn Guo (6):
ARM: imx5: adopt generic_chip irq_domain support for tzic
ARM: imx: eliminate macro IMX_GPIO_TO_IRQ()
ARM: imx: eliminate macro IOMUX_TO_IRQ()
ARM: imx: eliminate macro IRQ_GPIOx()
gpio/mxc: adopt irq_domain for gpio interrupt support
ARM: imx: remove macro MXC_GPIO_IRQ_START
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51.dtsi | 6 +++
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi | 6 +++
arch/arm/mach-imx/clock-mx51-mx53.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm/mach-imx/eukrea_mbimx27-baseboard.c | 3 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/eukrea_mbimx51-baseboard.c | 3 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/imx51-dt.c | 30 ++++++-------
arch/arm/mach-imx/imx53-dt.c | 30 ++++++-------
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-apf9328.c | 6 ++-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-armadillo5x0.c | 12 ++++--
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-cpuimx27.c | 12 ++++--
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-cpuimx35.c | 3 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-cpuimx51.c | 12 ++++--
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-cpuimx51sd.c | 6 ++-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx27_visstrim_m10.c | 8 ++--
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 14 ------
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-kzm_arm11_01.c | 20 +++++++--
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx21ads.c | 5 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx27_3ds.c | 3 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx27ads.c | 12 +++---
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31_3ds.c | 13 +++---
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31ads.c | 14 ++++--
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31lilly.c | 10 +++-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31lite.c | 10 +++-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31moboard.c | 4 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx53_ard.c | 5 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mxt_td60.c | 6 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-pca100.c | 4 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-pcm037.c | 18 +++++---
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-pcm038.c | 4 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-qong.c | 9 ++--
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-scb9328.c | 6 ++-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-vpr200.c | 3 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c | 6 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mx31lilly-db.c | 5 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mx31lite-db.c | 5 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/mx51_efika.c | 3 +-
arch/arm/mach-imx/pcm970-baseboard.c | 13 +++---
arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h | 3 +-
arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/hardware.h | 2 -
arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iomux-mx3.h | 3 -
arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iomux-v1.h | 12 +++---
arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/irqs.h | 2 -
arch/arm/plat-mxc/tzic.c | 32 +++++++-------
drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 59 ++++++++++---------------
44 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 210 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [GIT PULL] imx irq_domain migration 2012-02-16 15:49 [GIT PULL] imx irq_domain migration Shawn Guo @ 2012-02-16 17:50 ` Rob Herring 2012-02-17 1:01 ` Shawn Guo 2012-03-14 5:08 ` Shawn Guo 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Rob Herring @ 2012-02-16 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel Shawn, On 02/16/2012 09:49 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > Hi Rob, > > Please pull imx irq_domain support below. It's based on Grant's > irqdomain/next today with your generic-chip series applied on top > of it. You're asking me to pull changes on top of a branch that I don't even have as you've rebased my changes. While it would work I don't think this is the right flow. Plus there is not really any reason for iMX changes to go thru me. Either Grant needs to stabilize his branch so you and I can send him pull requests or he can pull in our changes and rebase them as he rebases. I already asked him to do just that with my 1 patch others are dependent on. Rob > Regards, > Shawn > > The following changes since commit 53d7d9ee4c6611b13d9e7c77c02d5e9deed95da5: > > gpio: pl061: enable interrupts with DT style binding (2012-02-16 07:07:16 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > http://git.linaro.org/git/people/shawnguo/linux-2.6.git imx/irqdomain > > Shawn Guo (6): > ARM: imx5: adopt generic_chip irq_domain support for tzic > ARM: imx: eliminate macro IMX_GPIO_TO_IRQ() > ARM: imx: eliminate macro IOMUX_TO_IRQ() > ARM: imx: eliminate macro IRQ_GPIOx() > gpio/mxc: adopt irq_domain for gpio interrupt support > ARM: imx: remove macro MXC_GPIO_IRQ_START > > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx51.dtsi | 6 +++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi | 6 +++ > arch/arm/mach-imx/clock-mx51-mx53.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++-- > arch/arm/mach-imx/eukrea_mbimx27-baseboard.c | 3 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/eukrea_mbimx51-baseboard.c | 3 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/imx51-dt.c | 30 ++++++------- > arch/arm/mach-imx/imx53-dt.c | 30 ++++++------- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-apf9328.c | 6 ++- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-armadillo5x0.c | 12 ++++-- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-cpuimx27.c | 12 ++++-- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-cpuimx35.c | 3 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-cpuimx51.c | 12 ++++-- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-cpuimx51sd.c | 6 ++- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx27_visstrim_m10.c | 8 ++-- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.c | 14 ------ > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-kzm_arm11_01.c | 20 +++++++-- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx21ads.c | 5 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx27_3ds.c | 3 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx27ads.c | 12 +++--- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31_3ds.c | 13 +++--- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31ads.c | 14 ++++-- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31lilly.c | 10 +++- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31lite.c | 10 +++- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx31moboard.c | 4 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mx53_ard.c | 5 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-mxt_td60.c | 6 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-pca100.c | 4 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-pcm037.c | 18 +++++--- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-pcm038.c | 4 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-qong.c | 9 ++-- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-scb9328.c | 6 ++- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-vpr200.c | 3 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mm-imx5.c | 6 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mx31lilly-db.c | 5 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mx31lite-db.c | 5 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/mx51_efika.c | 3 +- > arch/arm/mach-imx/pcm970-baseboard.c | 13 +++--- > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/common.h | 3 +- > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/hardware.h | 2 - > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iomux-mx3.h | 3 - > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iomux-v1.h | 12 +++--- > arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/irqs.h | 2 - > arch/arm/plat-mxc/tzic.c | 32 +++++++------- > drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c | 59 ++++++++++--------------- > 44 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 210 deletions(-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] imx irq_domain migration 2012-02-16 17:50 ` Rob Herring @ 2012-02-17 1:01 ` Shawn Guo 2012-03-14 5:08 ` Shawn Guo 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Shawn Guo @ 2012-02-17 1:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:50:10AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Shawn, > > On 02/16/2012 09:49 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > > > Please pull imx irq_domain support below. It's based on Grant's > > irqdomain/next today with your generic-chip series applied on top > > of it. > > You're asking me to pull changes on top of a branch that I don't even > have as you've rebased my changes. While it would work I don't think > this is the right flow. Plus there is not really any reason for iMX > changes to go thru me. > I thought I could ask you to pull because my changes depends on yours and Grant asked me to do so. > Either Grant needs to stabilize his branch so you and I can send him > pull requests or he can pull in our changes and rebase them as he > rebases. I already asked him to do just that with my 1 patch others are > dependent on. > I'm find with either way. -- Regards, Shawn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] imx irq_domain migration 2012-02-16 17:50 ` Rob Herring 2012-02-17 1:01 ` Shawn Guo @ 2012-03-14 5:08 ` Shawn Guo 2012-03-14 13:10 ` Rob Herring 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Shawn Guo @ 2012-03-14 5:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:50:10AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Shawn, > > On 02/16/2012 09:49 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > > Hi Rob, > > > > Please pull imx irq_domain support below. It's based on Grant's > > irqdomain/next today with your generic-chip series applied on top > > of it. > > You're asking me to pull changes on top of a branch that I don't even > have as you've rebased my changes. While it would work I don't think > this is the right flow. Plus there is not really any reason for iMX > changes to go thru me. > > Either Grant needs to stabilize his branch so you and I can send him > pull requests or he can pull in our changes and rebase them as he > rebases. I already asked him to do just that with my 1 patch others are > dependent on. > Hi Grant, Would you consider to take this request after you take Rob's generic_irq one? -- Regards, Shawn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] imx irq_domain migration 2012-03-14 5:08 ` Shawn Guo @ 2012-03-14 13:10 ` Rob Herring 2012-03-14 15:44 ` Grant Likely 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Rob Herring @ 2012-03-14 13:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On 03/14/2012 12:08 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:50:10AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >> Shawn, >> >> On 02/16/2012 09:49 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> Please pull imx irq_domain support below. It's based on Grant's >>> irqdomain/next today with your generic-chip series applied on top >>> of it. >> >> You're asking me to pull changes on top of a branch that I don't even >> have as you've rebased my changes. While it would work I don't think >> this is the right flow. Plus there is not really any reason for iMX >> changes to go thru me. >> >> Either Grant needs to stabilize his branch so you and I can send him >> pull requests or he can pull in our changes and rebase them as he >> rebases. I already asked him to do just that with my 1 patch others are >> dependent on. >> > Hi Grant, > > Would you consider to take this request after you take Rob's > generic_irq one? You'll need rebase your branch as I did since Grant did. Rob ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] imx irq_domain migration 2012-03-14 13:10 ` Rob Herring @ 2012-03-14 15:44 ` Grant Likely 2012-03-16 12:22 ` Shawn Guo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Grant Likely @ 2012-03-14 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/14/2012 12:08 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:50:10AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >>> Shawn, >>> >>> On 02/16/2012 09:49 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: >>>> Hi Rob, >>>> >>>> Please pull imx irq_domain support below. It's based on Grant's >>>> irqdomain/next today with your generic-chip series applied on top >>>> of it. >>> >>> You're asking me to pull changes on top of a branch that I don't even >>> have as you've rebased my changes. While it would work I don't think >>> this is the right flow. Plus there is not really any reason for iMX >>> changes to go thru me. >>> >>> Either Grant needs to stabilize his branch so you and I can send him >>> pull requests or he can pull in our changes and rebase them as he >>> rebases. I already asked him to do just that with my 1 patch others are >>> dependent on. >>> >> Hi Grant, >> >> Would you consider to take this request after you take Rob's >> generic_irq one? > > You'll need rebase your branch as I did since Grant did. Also, the imx changes should go via the arm-soc tree, not the irqdomain/next branch. irqdomain/next is stable now, so you can use it as your base. Rebase your changes on top of it and ask Arnd or Olof to pull the result into an arm-soc branch. g. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] imx irq_domain migration 2012-03-14 15:44 ` Grant Likely @ 2012-03-16 12:22 ` Shawn Guo 2012-03-17 0:18 ` Shawn Guo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Shawn Guo @ 2012-03-16 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 09:44:26AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 03/14/2012 12:08 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:50:10AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > >>> Shawn, > >>> > >>> On 02/16/2012 09:49 AM, Shawn Guo wrote: > >>>> Hi Rob, > >>>> > >>>> Please pull imx irq_domain support below. It's based on Grant's > >>>> irqdomain/next today with your generic-chip series applied on top > >>>> of it. > >>> > >>> You're asking me to pull changes on top of a branch that I don't even > >>> have as you've rebased my changes. While it would work I don't think > >>> this is the right flow. Plus there is not really any reason for iMX > >>> changes to go thru me. > >>> > >>> Either Grant needs to stabilize his branch so you and I can send him > >>> pull requests or he can pull in our changes and rebase them as he > >>> rebases. I already asked him to do just that with my 1 patch others are > >>> dependent on. > >>> > >> Hi Grant, > >> > >> Would you consider to take this request after you take Rob's > >> generic_irq one? > > > > You'll need rebase your branch as I did since Grant did. > > Also, the imx changes should go via the arm-soc tree, not the > irqdomain/next branch. irqdomain/next is stable now, so you can use > it as your base. Rebase your changes on top of it and ask Arnd or > Olof to pull the result into an arm-soc branch. > Okay. Since imx change has a dependency on Rob's change, I have to wait until Rob's change shows up on irqdomain/next. -- Regards, Shawn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [GIT PULL] imx irq_domain migration 2012-03-16 12:22 ` Shawn Guo @ 2012-03-17 0:18 ` Shawn Guo 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Shawn Guo @ 2012-03-17 0:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-arm-kernel On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 08:22:46PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: ... > Okay. Since imx change has a dependency on Rob's change, I have to > wait until Rob's change shows up on irqdomain/next. It does not matter now. Arnd announced that arm-soc tree has closed for the coming merge window. I will wait for v3.4-rc1 then. -- Regards, Shawn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-03-17 0:18 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-02-16 15:49 [GIT PULL] imx irq_domain migration Shawn Guo 2012-02-16 17:50 ` Rob Herring 2012-02-17 1:01 ` Shawn Guo 2012-03-14 5:08 ` Shawn Guo 2012-03-14 13:10 ` Rob Herring 2012-03-14 15:44 ` Grant Likely 2012-03-16 12:22 ` Shawn Guo 2012-03-17 0:18 ` Shawn Guo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).