From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:37:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 02/10] ARM: ux500: Initial Device Tree support for Snowball In-Reply-To: <201203141358.03541.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1331730306-11461-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1331730306-11461-3-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <201203141358.03541.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <4F60AD39.6020009@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 14/03/12 13:58, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 14 March 2012, Lee Jones wrote: >> >> From: Arnd Bergmann >> >> This provides very basic Device Tree support for ST-Ericsson's >> low-cost development platform, Snowball. If Device Tree for >> ux500 is enabled and the correct board is configured within the >> Device Tree blob, the correct *_init_machine() will be called. >> >> This patch is based on some original work completed by: >> Niklas Hernaeus >> >> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann >> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones >> Signed-off-by: Niklas Hernaeus > > As mentioned on IRC, the order of the S-o-B should be such that the > person submitting a patch comes last, so this one should be > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > Signed-off-by: Niklas Hernaeus > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > or maybe > > Signed-off-by: Niklas Hernaeus > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones Sorry I missed that. Just for my clarification, how important is that? Is it re-spin a patch-set important? > The patch itself looks good to me, but that is not surprising, > given that I wrote it ;-). -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog