From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit) Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 00:38:13 +0100 Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: OMAP: i2c, gpio, spi and regulator DTS updates In-Reply-To: <20120314232147.GU12083@atomide.com> References: <4F5E89B4.4010505@ti.com> <4F6120A5.6050407@ti.com> <20120314225743.GT12083@atomide.com> <4F6123E4.5090808@ti.com> <20120314232147.GU12083@atomide.com> Message-ID: <4F612BE5.5000603@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 3/15/2012 12:21 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Cousson, Benoit [120314 16:06]: >> On 3/14/2012 11:57 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Cousson, Benoit [120314 15:52]: >>>> Hi Tony, >>>> >>>> It looks like Chris Ball just queued the HSMMC DT stuff from >>>> Rajendra, so I can add as well the MMC DTS for OMAP3 and OMAP4 as >>>> well. >>>> >>>> It is fine for an update? >>> >>> Sure, I'm not planning to pull this until after the merge >>> window. >> >> OK, so we will not have the DTS support for the new drivers for 3.4 :-( > > Well you said this one has driver dependencies :) Well, this is not a strong dependency, but it is still better to have the driver adapted to use the DTS node. What is really unfair is that I did remove the DTS from the driver series to avoid conflict during merge of the various driver series. So next time, I guess I'd rather let the DTS along with the driver, but this is really a pity. >> Well, if you pull that in a lo branch, that will be enough to base >> the further work on it. > > Right we got something like seven branches ready to go for > early merging after the merge window.. We should have patches > sitting in linux-next for at least a week before the merge > window opens. I know that, but since it is just a bunch of DTS, none of them will break anything in linux-next anyway... >>>> Than I can add as Kevin's patch for twl irq_base removal. >>> >>> Hmm I don't follow. That's needed first as a fix for the >>> merge window? >> >> No, not that one. It is just some more cleanup on top of the one >> Felipe already did in the twl series I've just sent to Samuel. >> But if you do not plan to pull that series for 3.4, that does not >> really matter. > > Ah OK. In that case feel free to update. Also check if some > of these can be sent as fixes during the -rc cycle? No, that should be fine, this one can wait 3.5. Regards, Benoit