From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: OMAP: boards: changes to support dynamic irq alloc
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:58:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F67B9F9.1030906@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120319191743.GB9859@atomide.com>
Hi Tony,
On 3/19/2012 8:17 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tarun Kanti DebBarma<tarun.kanti@ti.com> [120319 05:09]:
>> These two patches incorporate changes to OMAP1 and OMAP2 platforms
>> board files whereby older references to OMAP_GPIO_IRQ macro are
>> now replaced with gpio_to_irq(), thereby getting rid of static
>> irq references.
>>
>> Reference: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git omap/dt
>> Commit: 9a0cee711448335ec43eae83272495e9334c0098
>
> Can you please tell the exact two commits causing this
> breakage?
Well, this is the GPIO DT + SPARSE_IRQ series I have done. It appears
that the boards I have were already using properly gpio_to_irq() and
thus were working fine with this series.
But this is unfortunately not the case of most OMAP2 and 3 legacy boards
that were still using an old OMAP way of converting GPIO to IRQ and were
never modified to take advantage of the gpiolib stuff.
So if these patches are apply before the GPIO DT + SPARSE_IRQ series,
there will be no breakage at all.
All the cleanup we have never done before will hurt us at some point
when we will start using more extensively newer fmwk (DT, sparse_irq,
dmaengine...). It was not done on purpose, but this GPIO series
highlighted this remaining static broken mapping inside OMAP boards.
> I'm baffled how despite all the effort for previnting
> issues like this this still happen. These all seem valid
> fixes and clean up things, but how come this was not seen
> earlier?
Maybe because there are much more boards inside mach-omap2 directory
than inside my cubicle... :-(
Regards,
Benoit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-19 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-19 12:06 [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: OMAP: boards: changes to support dynamic irq alloc Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-19 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] ARM: OMAP1: boards: Fix OMAP_GPIO_IRQ usage with gpio_to_irq() Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-29 4:58 ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-29 5:34 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-19 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] ARM: OMAP2+: " Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-19 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] drivers: input: Fix OMAP_GPIO_IRQ with gpio_to_irq() in ams_delta_serio_exit() Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-20 16:52 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-20 17:36 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2012-03-19 12:06 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM: OMAP: Remove OMAP_GPIO_IRQ macro definition Tarun Kanti DebBarma
2012-03-19 12:17 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: OMAP: boards: changes to support dynamic irq alloc Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-03-19 12:30 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-19 19:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-19 22:58 ` Cousson, Benoit [this message]
2012-03-19 23:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-20 9:00 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-20 10:59 ` DebBarma, Tarun Kanti
2012-03-20 16:51 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F67B9F9.1030906@ti.com \
--to=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).