From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:00:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] ARM: OMAP: boards: changes to support dynamic irq alloc In-Reply-To: <20120319233910.GF9859@atomide.com> References: <1332158817-26311-1-git-send-email-tarun.kanti@ti.com> <20120319191743.GB9859@atomide.com> <4F67B9F9.1030906@ti.com> <20120319233910.GF9859@atomide.com> Message-ID: <4F68471A.4010502@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 3/20/2012 12:39 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Cousson, Benoit [120319 16:00]: >> Hi Tony, >> >> On 3/19/2012 8:17 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Tarun Kanti DebBarma [120319 05:09]: >>>> These two patches incorporate changes to OMAP1 and OMAP2 platforms >>>> board files whereby older references to OMAP_GPIO_IRQ macro are >>>> now replaced with gpio_to_irq(), thereby getting rid of static >>>> irq references. >>>> >>>> Reference: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git omap/dt >>>> Commit: 9a0cee711448335ec43eae83272495e9334c0098 >>> >>> Can you please tell the exact two commits causing this >>> breakage? >> >> Well, this is the GPIO DT + SPARSE_IRQ series I have done. It >> appears that the boards I have were already using properly >> gpio_to_irq() and thus were working fine with this series. >> >> But this is unfortunately not the case of most OMAP2 and 3 legacy >> boards that were still using an old OMAP way of converting GPIO to >> IRQ and were never modified to take advantage of the gpiolib stuff. >> >> So if these patches are apply before the GPIO DT + SPARSE_IRQ >> series, there will be no breakage at all. >> >> All the cleanup we have never done before will hurt us at some point >> when we will start using more extensively newer fmwk (DT, >> sparse_irq, dmaengine...). It was not done on purpose, but this GPIO >> series highlighted this remaining static broken mapping inside OMAP >> boards. > > Yes I understand. But still, which patch(s) cause the issue > so we can put that in the changelog for the fixes? OK, here they are: 25db711 gpio/omap: Fix IRQ handling for SPARSE_IRQ 384ebe1 gpio/omap: Add DT support to GPIO driver Tarun, You should indeed add the references in your cover letter. >>> I'm baffled how despite all the effort for previnting >>> issues like this this still happen. These all seem valid >>> fixes and clean up things, but how come this was not seen >>> earlier? >> >> Maybe because there are much more boards inside mach-omap2 directory >> than inside my cubicle... :-( > > Well somehow we need to make sure that patches get properly > tested on a reasonable selection of boards. This pretty much > breaks things for 21 boards out of the 51 board-*.c files :( What is too bad is that one broken board was enough to figured out the issue and fix all the other ones. I just did not have that one :-( Regards, Benoit