From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: santosh.shilimkar@ti.com (Santosh Shilimkar)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 15:37:46 +0530
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] OMAP4 cpuidle cleanup
In-Reply-To: <1332322070-24577-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
References: <1332322070-24577-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <4F69A872.50203@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Daniel,

On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
> The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
> driver itself.
> 
> A couple a things call my intention. Why the cpuidle device is set for cpu0 only
> and why the WFI is not used ?
> 
> Daniel Lezcano (7):
>   ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove unused valid field
>   ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Declare the states with the driver declaration
>   ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove the cpuidle_params_table table
>   ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - fix static omap4_idle_data declaration
>   ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Initialize omap4_idle_data at compile time
>   ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - use the omap4_idle_data variable directly
>   ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - remove omap4_idle_data initialization at boot
>     time
> 
The series looks fine to me in general. This clean-up is applicable
for OMAP3 cpuidle code as well.

I want Jean to look at this series because some of his earlier
clean up has introduced those custom functions which
are getting removed in this series.

Regards
santosh