From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 11:49:01 +0100
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] OMAP4 cpuidle cleanup
In-Reply-To: <4F69A872.50203@ti.com>
References: <1332322070-24577-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
 <4F69A872.50203@ti.com>
Message-ID: <4F69B21D.4050302@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 03/21/2012 11:07 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> On Wednesday 21 March 2012 02:57 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> This patchset is a proposition to improve a bit the code.
>> The changes are code cleanup and does not change the behavior of the
>> driver itself.
>>
>> A couple a things call my intention. Why the cpuidle device is set for cpu0 only
>> and why the WFI is not used ?
>>
>> Daniel Lezcano (7):
>>    ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove unused valid field
>>    ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Declare the states with the driver declaration
>>    ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove the cpuidle_params_table table
>>    ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - fix static omap4_idle_data declaration
>>    ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Initialize omap4_idle_data at compile time
>>    ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - use the omap4_idle_data variable directly
>>    ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - remove omap4_idle_data initialization at boot
>>      time
>>
> The series looks fine to me in general. This clean-up is applicable
> for OMAP3 cpuidle code as well.

Yes, I am planning to do the same for omap3.

Thanks for reviewing.

   -- Daniel

> I want Jean to look at this series because some of his earlier
> clean up has introduced those custom functions which
> are getting removed in this series.
>
> Regards
> santosh
>
>


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog