From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@st.com (Viresh Kumar) Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 10:33:21 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: SPEAr600: Add device-tree support to SPEAr600 boards In-Reply-To: <201203271359.16553.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1331650032-15274-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <201203271159.35306.arnd@arndb.de> <201203271359.16553.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <4F729B99.4020909@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 3/27/2012 7:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > That would be even better. I think we should generally try do initialization > as late as possible, ideally from initcalls. The init_early() function should > only be used for code that absolutely has to be run from setup_arch() and > no later, while the map_io() function should ideally only be used to set up > the static mappings and nothing else. I remember now why we do it in map_io(). Timers need clock support and they are up before machine_init() is called. So, i believe i must have DT_MACHINE_START per SoC. I will post V2 for 3xx DT support today, but can i have initial level of review from you, so that i can fixup minor issues in V2 only? -- viresh