From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 17:04:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 06/13] USB: ohci-at91: change maximum number of ports In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4F7B1174.5070300@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/03/2012 04:11 PM, Alan Stern : > On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote: > >> Change number of ports to 3 for newer SoCs. Modify pdata structure >> and ohci-at91 code that was dealing with ports information and check >> of port indexes. >> >> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre >> Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > > Did you run this patch through scripts/checkpatch.pl? I have the > feeling that it might complain about some of the changes. Yes, definitively. I can modify the patch to comply with error issued by checkpatch.pl: several are due to a bad replacement of previous code with my regular expression but others where existing before my modifications. So what do you think about: - addressing all style errors in this patch (to prevent carrying them) - merging this one and the following patch: "[PATCH v2 07/13] USB: ohci-at91: coding style modifications with one-line ifs - posting a v3 of this patch only if you agree on this... Best regards, -- Nicolas Ferre