linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: prylowski@metasoft.pl (Rafal Prylowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] ep93xx: IDE driver platform support code
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 14:15:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F7D8CFB.70100@metasoft.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ADE657CA350FB648AAC2C43247A983F002069840A0CF@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net>

[linux-ide mailing list removed from Cc, because topic is not related to IDE/libata]

On 2012-04-04 19:11, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 04, 2012 9:43 AM, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> On Wednesday, April 04, 2012 9:20 AM, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, April 04, 2012 1:41 AM, Rafal Prylowski wrote:
>>>> On 2012-04-03 19:41, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>>> [not related to my patch, but ep93xx keypad]:
>>>> Isn't ep93xx_keypad_acquire_gpio be more correct if we apply the following patch:
>>>>
>>>> Index: linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c
>>>> ===================================================================
>>>> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c
>>>> +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c
>>>> @@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ int ep93xx_keypad_acquire_gpio(struct pl
>>>>  fail_gpio_d:
>>>>  	gpio_free(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_C(i));
>>>>  fail_gpio_c:
>>>> -	for ( ; i >= 0; --i) {
>>>> +	for (--i; i >= 0; --i) {
>>>>  		gpio_free(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_C(i));
>>>>  		gpio_free(EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_D(i));
>>>>  	}
>>>>
>>>> This way we don't double free EP93XX_GPIO_LINE_C(i), and don't free lines which were not
>>>> successfully acquired (I noticed this when writing my patch, which is based on
>>>> ep93xx_keypad_acquire/release_gpio).
>>>
>>> You are correct... ;-)
>>>
>>> Care to submit an actual patch?

Yes, patch should be on LAKML already.

>>
>> Note, if/when the devm_gpio_request patch gets into the kernel tree we can use
>> that and get rid of the gpio_free's completely.

I doubt if using devm_gpio_request() would help here. We need to call both
ep93xx_*_acquire and ep93xx_*_release_gpio in drivers, because it also sets up
some registers, etc. If ep93xx_*_acquire_gpio fails, then gpio lines should be
freed immediately and not when the driver unloads (because the driver might
want to use them in some other way..).

>>
>> Sorry, I don't have a link to that patch...
> 
> I just pulled linux-next. It looks like the devm_gpio_* stuff is now in.
> 
> commit 1a0703ede4493bd74f9c6b53f782b749e175a88e
> Author: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
> Date:   Tue Dec 20 21:40:21 2011 +0100
> 
>     GPIO: add bindings for managed devices
>     
>     This patch adds 2 functions that allow managed devices to request GPIOs.
>     These GPIOs will then be managed by drivers/base/devres.c.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
>     Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> 

I see that this is also in v3.4rc1 :)

Regards,
RP

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-05 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-03 14:42 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add PATA host controller support for Cirrus Logic EP93xx CPU Rafal Prylowski
2012-04-03 14:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] PATA host controller driver for ep93xx Rafal Prylowski
2012-04-03 18:25   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-04-03 20:08     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-03 20:37       ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-04-04 12:50         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-04 12:40       ` Rafal Prylowski
2012-04-04 13:23         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-04 15:11           ` Rafal Prylowski
2012-04-04 15:16             ` Rafal Prylowski
2012-04-04 15:23               ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-05  7:52                 ` Rafal Prylowski
2012-04-05  9:07                   ` Rafal Prylowski
2012-04-04  7:39     ` Rafal Prylowski
2012-04-03 18:55   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-04-04  7:47     ` Rafal Prylowski
2012-04-03 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ep93xx: IDE driver platform support code Rafal Prylowski
2012-04-03 17:41   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-04-04  8:41     ` Rafal Prylowski
2012-04-04 16:20       ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-04-04 16:43         ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-04-04 17:11           ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-04-05 12:15             ` Rafal Prylowski [this message]
2012-04-04  1:43   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-04-03 14:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ep93xx: Add IDE support to edb93xx boards Rafal Prylowski
2012-04-03 17:44   ` H Hartley Sweeten

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F7D8CFB.70100@metasoft.pl \
    --to=prylowski@metasoft.pl \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).