linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: prylowski@metasoft.pl (Rafal Prylowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ep93xx: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:18:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F853053.7040800@metasoft.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ADE657CA350FB648AAC2C43247A983F00206986C01D4@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net>

On 2012-04-10 19:55, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 10:29 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:09:50AM -0500, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>>
>> Now that the spurious interrupts thing with VIC has been sorted out, should we
>> revisit this patch? Hartley, do you have any objections merging this?
> 
> I have not had a chance to look at this with the VIC issue fixed.
> 
> Last time I tried testing the double buffering patch my system would not boot
> correctly. I'll try to test this again shortly.
> 
> Rafal,
> 
> Could you repost the latest version of the patch?
> 

Hi,

Here is the patch. It applies to current mainline (3.4rc2). The only thing that
has changed is additional call to ep93xx_dma_advance_active(..) before disabling
the channel.


Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels.

Signed-off-by: Rafal Prylowski <prylowski@metasoft.pl>

Index: linux-2.6/drivers/dma/ep93xx_dma.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/dma/ep93xx_dma.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/dma/ep93xx_dma.c
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
 #define M2M_CONTROL_TM_SHIFT		13
 #define M2M_CONTROL_TM_TX		(1 << M2M_CONTROL_TM_SHIFT)
 #define M2M_CONTROL_TM_RX		(2 << M2M_CONTROL_TM_SHIFT)
+#define M2M_CONTROL_NFBINT		BIT(21)
 #define M2M_CONTROL_RSS_SHIFT		22
 #define M2M_CONTROL_RSS_SSPRX		(1 << M2M_CONTROL_RSS_SHIFT)
 #define M2M_CONTROL_RSS_SSPTX		(2 << M2M_CONTROL_RSS_SHIFT)
@@ -79,7 +80,23 @@
 #define M2M_CONTROL_PWSC_SHIFT		25
 
 #define M2M_INTERRUPT			0x0004
-#define M2M_INTERRUPT_DONEINT		BIT(1)
+#define M2M_INTERRUPT_MASK		6
+
+#define M2M_STATUS			0x000c
+#define M2M_STATUS_CTL_SHIFT		1
+#define M2M_STATUS_CTL_IDLE		(0 << M2M_STATUS_CTL_SHIFT)
+#define M2M_STATUS_CTL_STALL		(1 << M2M_STATUS_CTL_SHIFT)
+#define M2M_STATUS_CTL_MEMRD		(2 << M2M_STATUS_CTL_SHIFT)
+#define M2M_STATUS_CTL_MEMWR		(3 << M2M_STATUS_CTL_SHIFT)
+#define M2M_STATUS_CTL_BWCWAIT		(4 << M2M_STATUS_CTL_SHIFT)
+#define M2M_STATUS_CTL_MASK		(7 << M2M_STATUS_CTL_SHIFT)
+#define M2M_STATUS_BUF_SHIFT		4
+#define M2M_STATUS_BUF_NO		(0 << M2M_STATUS_BUF_SHIFT)
+#define M2M_STATUS_BUF_ON		(1 << M2M_STATUS_BUF_SHIFT)
+#define M2M_STATUS_BUF_NEXT		(2 << M2M_STATUS_BUF_SHIFT)
+#define M2M_STATUS_BUF_MASK		(3 << M2M_STATUS_BUF_SHIFT)
+#define M2M_STATUS_DONE			BIT(6)
+
 
 #define M2M_BCR0			0x0010
 #define M2M_BCR1			0x0014
@@ -426,15 +443,6 @@ static int m2p_hw_interrupt(struct ep93x
 
 /*
  * M2M DMA implementation
- *
- * For the M2M transfers we don't use NFB at all. This is because it simply
- * doesn't work well with memcpy transfers. When you submit both buffers it is
- * extremely unlikely that you get an NFB interrupt, but it instead reports
- * DONE interrupt and both buffers are already transferred which means that we
- * weren't able to update the next buffer.
- *
- * So for now we "simulate" NFB by just submitting buffer after buffer
- * without double buffering.
  */
 
 static int m2m_hw_setup(struct ep93xx_dma_chan *edmac)
@@ -543,6 +551,11 @@ static void m2m_hw_submit(struct ep93xx_
 	m2m_fill_desc(edmac);
 	control |= M2M_CONTROL_DONEINT;
 
+	if (ep93xx_dma_advance_active(edmac)) {
+		m2m_fill_desc(edmac);
+		control |= M2M_CONTROL_NFBINT;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Now we can finally enable the channel. For M2M channel this must be
 	 * done _after_ the BCRx registers are programmed.
@@ -560,32 +573,86 @@ static void m2m_hw_submit(struct ep93xx_
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * According to EP93xx User's Guide, we should receive DONE interrupt when all
+ * M2M DMA controller transactions complete normally. This is not always the
+ * case - sometimes EP93xx M2M DMA asserts DONE interrupt when the DMA channel
+ * is still running (channel Buffer FSM in DMA_BUF_ON state, and channel
+ * Control FSM in DMA_MEM_RD state, observed@least in IDE-DMA operation).
+ * In effect, disabling the channel when only DONE bit is set could stop
+ * currently running DMA transfer. To avoid this, we use Buffer FSM and
+ * Control FSM to check current state of DMA channel.
+ */
 static int m2m_hw_interrupt(struct ep93xx_dma_chan *edmac)
 {
+	u32 status = readl(edmac->regs + M2M_STATUS);
+	u32 ctl_fsm = status & M2M_STATUS_CTL_MASK;
+	u32 buf_fsm = status & M2M_STATUS_BUF_MASK;
+	bool done = status & M2M_STATUS_DONE;
+	bool last;
 	u32 control;
 
-	if (!(readl(edmac->regs + M2M_INTERRUPT) & M2M_INTERRUPT_DONEINT))
+	/* Accept only DONE and NFB interrupts */
+	if (!(readl(edmac->regs + M2M_INTERRUPT) & M2M_INTERRUPT_MASK))
 		return INTERRUPT_UNKNOWN;
 
-	/* Clear the DONE bit */
-	writel(0, edmac->regs + M2M_INTERRUPT);
+	if (done)
+		/* Clear the DONE bit */
+		writel(0, edmac->regs + M2M_INTERRUPT);
 
-	/* Disable interrupts and the channel */
-	control = readl(edmac->regs + M2M_CONTROL);
-	control &= ~(M2M_CONTROL_DONEINT | M2M_CONTROL_ENABLE);
-	writel(control, edmac->regs + M2M_CONTROL);
+	/*
+	 * Check whether we are done with descriptors or not. This, together
+	 * with DMA channel state, determines action to take in interrupt.
+	 */
+	last = list_first_entry(edmac->active.next,
+		struct ep93xx_dma_desc, node)->txd.cookie;
 
 	/*
-	 * Since we only get DONE interrupt we have to find out ourselves
-	 * whether there still is something to process. So we try to advance
-	 * the chain an see whether it succeeds.
+	 * Use M2M DMA Buffer FSM and Control FSM to check current state of
+	 * DMA channel. Using DONE and NFB bits from channel status register
+	 * or bits from channel interrupt register was proven not to be
+	 * reliable.
 	 */
-	if (ep93xx_dma_advance_active(edmac)) {
-		edmac->edma->hw_submit(edmac);
+	if (!last &&
+	    (buf_fsm == M2M_STATUS_BUF_NO ||
+	     buf_fsm == M2M_STATUS_BUF_ON)) {
+		/*
+		 * Two buffers are ready for update when Buffer FSM is in
+		 * DMA_NO_BUF state. Only one buffer can be prepared without
+		 * disabling the channel, or polling the DONE bit.
+		 * To simplify things, always prepare only one buffer.
+		 */
+		ep93xx_dma_advance_active(edmac);
+		m2m_fill_desc(edmac);
+		if (done && !edmac->chan.private) {
+			/* Software trigger for memcpy channel */
+			control = readl(edmac->regs + M2M_CONTROL);
+			control |= M2M_CONTROL_START;
+			writel(control, edmac->regs + M2M_CONTROL);
+		}
 		return INTERRUPT_NEXT_BUFFER;
 	}
 
-	return INTERRUPT_DONE;
+	/*
+	 * Disable the channel only when Buffer FSM is in DMA_NO_BUF state
+	 * and Control FSM is in DMA_STALL state.
+	 */
+	if (last &&
+	    buf_fsm == M2M_STATUS_BUF_NO &&
+	    ctl_fsm == M2M_STATUS_CTL_STALL) {
+		ep93xx_dma_advance_active(edmac);
+		/* Disable interrupts and the channel */
+		control = readl(edmac->regs + M2M_CONTROL);
+		control &= ~(M2M_CONTROL_DONEINT | M2M_CONTROL_NFBINT
+			    | M2M_CONTROL_ENABLE);
+		writel(control, edmac->regs + M2M_CONTROL);
+		return INTERRUPT_DONE;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Nothing to do this time.
+	 */
+	return INTERRUPT_NEXT_BUFFER;
 }
 
 /*

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-11  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-20  8:09 [PATCH] ep93xx: Implement double buffering for M2M DMA channels Rafal Prylowski
2012-03-21  7:07 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-03-21  7:47   ` Rafal Prylowski
2012-03-21 19:33     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-03-21 17:12 ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-03-21 19:32   ` Mika Westerberg
2012-03-22  0:47     ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-03-22  7:37       ` Mika Westerberg
2012-03-22 18:52         ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-03-22 20:03           ` Mika Westerberg
2012-03-22 21:36             ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-03-22 23:56             ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-03-23  7:00               ` Mika Westerberg
2012-03-22 10:16   ` Rafal Prylowski
2012-03-21 19:38 ` Mika Westerberg
2012-03-23  2:19   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-03-23  7:04     ` Mika Westerberg
2012-03-23 16:09       ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-03-24  7:32         ` Mika Westerberg
2012-03-26  6:44           ` Rafal Prylowski
2012-03-29 22:33           ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-04-01 18:49             ` Mika Westerberg
2012-04-10 17:28         ` Mika Westerberg
2012-04-10 17:55           ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-04-11  7:18             ` Rafal Prylowski [this message]
2012-04-16 18:59               ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-04-17  7:15                 ` Rafal Prylowski
2012-04-17 15:46                   ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-04-17 20:51                     ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-04-18 16:41                       ` Rafal Prylowski
2012-04-18 17:01                         ` H Hartley Sweeten
2012-03-22  0:57 ` Ryan Mallon
2012-03-22 10:00   ` Rafal Prylowski
2012-03-22 13:14     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-03-22 14:13       ` Rafal Prylowski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F853053.7040800@metasoft.pl \
    --to=prylowski@metasoft.pl \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).