linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Remove un-used control module headers and defines.
       [not found] <1330338743-24097-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
@ 2012-04-12 10:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar
  2012-04-12 12:57   ` Cousson, Benoit
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Santosh Shilimkar @ 2012-04-12 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Benoit,

On Monday 27 February 2012 04:02 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Most of the OMAP4 control module register defines are not used and
> can be removed. Keep only needed defines and move them to common
> control module header just like other OMAP versions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
> ---

What do you think about this patch ?

Regards
Santosh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Remove un-used control module headers and defines.
  2012-04-12 10:31 ` [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Remove un-used control module headers and defines Santosh Shilimkar
@ 2012-04-12 12:57   ` Cousson, Benoit
  2012-04-16  9:34     ` Santosh Shilimkar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Cousson, Benoit @ 2012-04-12 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hi Santosh,

On 4/12/2012 12:31 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Benoit,
>
> On Monday 27 February 2012 04:02 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Most of the OMAP4 control module register defines are not used and
>> can be removed. Keep only needed defines and move them to common
>> control module header just like other OMAP versions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>> ---
>
> What do you think about this patch ?

I'm fine with it. I'm just wondering if we have to send it right now or 
along with the control module driver implementation we've just started.

Regards,
Benoit

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Remove un-used control module headers and defines.
  2012-04-12 12:57   ` Cousson, Benoit
@ 2012-04-16  9:34     ` Santosh Shilimkar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Santosh Shilimkar @ 2012-04-16  9:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Thursday 12 April 2012 06:27 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Hi Santosh,
> 
> On 4/12/2012 12:31 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Benoit,
>>
>> On Monday 27 February 2012 04:02 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>>> Most of the OMAP4 control module register defines are not used and
>>> can be removed. Keep only needed defines and move them to common
>>> control module header just like other OMAP versions.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> What do you think about this patch ?
> 
> I'm fine with it. I'm just wondering if we have to send it right now or
> along with the control module driver implementation we've just started.
> 
Let's do that as part of the driver implementation.

Regards
Santosh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-04-16  9:34 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <1330338743-24097-1-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
2012-04-12 10:31 ` [PATCH 1/1] ARM: OMAP4: Remove un-used control module headers and defines Santosh Shilimkar
2012-04-12 12:57   ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-04-16  9:34     ` Santosh Shilimkar

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).