linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com (KOSAKI Motohiro)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ARM: remove consistent dma region and use common vmalloc range for dma allocations
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 14:18:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F8DB3DC.7000602@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F8B76B9.1060505@kernel.org>

(4/15/12 9:32 PM), Minchan Kim wrote:
> On 04/14/2012 03:38 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:05:50PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> This patch changes dma-mapping subsystem to use generic vmalloc areas
>>> for all consistent dma allocations. This increases the total size limit
>>> of the consistent allocations and removes platform hacks and a lot of
>>> duplicated code.
>>
>> NAK. I don't think you appreciate the contexts from which the dma coherent
>> code can be called from, and the reason why we pre-allocate the page
>> tables (so that IRQ-based allocations work.)
>>
>> The vmalloc region doesn't allow that because page tables are allocated
>> using GFP_KERNEL not GFP_ATOMIC.
>>
>> Sorry.
>>
>
> Off-topic.
>
> I don't know why vmalloc functions have gfp_t argument.
> As Russel pointed out, we allocates page tables with GFP_KERNEL regardless of gfp_t passed.
> It means gfp_t passed is useless.
> I see there are many cases calling __vmalloc with GFP_NOFS, even GFP_ATOMIC. Then, it could end up deadlocking in reclaim context or schedule bug.
> I'm not sure why we can't see such bugs until now.
> If I didn't miss something, Shouldn't we fix it?

I believe it should be fixed. of course. :)

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-17 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-13 14:05 [PATCH 0/4] ARM: replace custom consistent dma region with vmalloc Marek Szyprowski
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: vmalloc: use const void * for caller argument Marek Szyprowski
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm: vmalloc: export find_vm_area() function Marek Szyprowski
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: vmalloc: add VM_DMA flag to indicate areas used by dma-mapping framework Marek Szyprowski
2012-04-13 14:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: remove consistent dma region and use common vmalloc range for dma allocations Marek Szyprowski
2012-04-13 18:38   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-16  1:32     ` Minchan Kim
2012-04-17 18:18       ` KOSAKI Motohiro [this message]
     [not found] ` <CALYq+qSMPoVC5OF+oBbt_i7O+_fmogLCtpqTAqHbsv1TcKrPdA@mail.gmail.com>
2012-04-23 20:58   ` [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 0/4] ARM: replace custom consistent dma region with vmalloc Daniel Vetter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F8DB3DC.7000602@gmail.com \
    --to=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).