From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@st.com (Viresh Kumar) Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 14:46:58 +0530 Subject: [PATCH 00/13] SPEAr: Move to common clock framework In-Reply-To: <201204190857.19770.arnd@arndb.de> References: <201204190857.19770.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <4F8FD80A.1020901@st.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 4/19/2012 2:27 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > My preference would be to have the whole series go through your tree > and move the implementation of the spear clock code to drivers/clk > in the process. This will reduce interdependencies between the spear > clock branch and other branches that have spear patches. Atleast for now, SPEAr clock patches have dependency on earlier SPEAr patches for which i have already sent you pull request. So, this time atleast, these may go through your tree only. You are talking about moving all clk files to drivers/clk or part of them (plat/clk-*.c or mach/clock.c) Also, i don't know what's the best way, but arch/arm/*spear* looks to be the better place for SPEAr clock stuff. As it shares lot of registers/macros with non-clock stuff. If we keep them in drivers/clk we have to include files. -- viresh