linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/17][V2] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - remove the 'valid' field
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 16:02:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F901ADA.1020302@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874nss8pn9.fsf@ti.com>

On 04/10/2012 01:13 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>  writes:
>
>> With the previous changes all the states are valid, except
>> the last state which can be handled by decreasing the number
>> of states.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet<j-pihet@ti.com>
>> ---

[ ... ]

>>   	if (IS_PM34XX_ERRATUM(PM_SDRC_WAKEUP_ERRATUM_i583)) {
>> -		cx->valid = 0;
>> +		drv->state_count = OMAP3_NUM_STATES - 1;
>>   		pr_warn("%s: core off state C7 disabled due to i583\n",
>>   			__func__);
>
> I'm not too particular about this one, but it might be cleaner to just
> remove this check all together.  This errata already has a check in
> next_valid_state() so strictly speaking, it's not needed here.

Yes, right. Thanks for pointing this.


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-19 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-04 20:12 [PATCH 00/17][V2] ARM: OMAP3/4 : cpuidle34xx and cpuidle44xx cleanups Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 01/17][V2] ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove unused valid field Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 02/17][V2] ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Declare the states with the driver declaration Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-09 22:37   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-19 13:58     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-23 14:06       ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-23 17:08         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-23 22:11           ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-24  0:27             ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 03/17][V2] ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Remove the cpuidle_params_table table Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 04/17][V2] ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - fix static omap4_idle_data declaration Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-09 22:38   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 05/17][V2] ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - Initialize omap4_idle_data at compile time Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 06/17][V2] ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - use the omap4_idle_data variable directly Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-09 22:56   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-19 14:49     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 07/17][V2] ARM: OMAP4: cpuidle - remove omap4_idle_data initialization at boot time Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-09 22:40   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 08/17][V2] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - remove rx51 cpuidle parameters table Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 09/17][V2] ARM: OMAP3: define cpuidle statically Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 10/17][V2] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - remove the 'valid' field Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-09 23:13   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-19 14:02     ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 11/17][V2] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - remove cpuidle_params_table Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-09 23:12   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 12/17][V2] ARM: OMAP3: define statically the omap3_idle_data Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 13/17][V2] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - use omap3_idle_data directly Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 14/17][V2] ARM: OMAP3 : cpuidle - simplify next_valid_state Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 15/17][V2] ARM: OMAP3: set omap3_idle_data as static Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 16/17][V2] ARM: OMAP3/4: consolidate cpuidle Makefile Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-04 20:12 ` [PATCH 17/17][V2] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - set global variables static Daniel Lezcano
2012-04-09 23:23 ` [PATCH 00/17][V2] ARM: OMAP3/4 : cpuidle34xx and cpuidle44xx cleanups Kevin Hilman
2012-04-19 14:03   ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F901ADA.1020302@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).