From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 02/16] drivers/gpio: gpio-nomadik: Add support for irqdomains
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:01:47 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F90D19B.9020408@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201204191623.07445.arnd@arndb.de>
On 04/19/2012 11:23 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 April 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>>
>>> The problem is that we cannot put the interrupt resources into the platform
>>> device until the irq domain has been added. Right now, we set the gic
>>> interrupt domain from init_IRQ(), then add the load the gpio
>>> driver from core_initcall(nmk_gpio_init) and add the platform devices
>>> from arch_initcall(customize_machine).
>>>
>>> This feels fragile because it depends on the gpio device getting probed
>>> before any device using the gpio interrupts. It does seem to work fine
>>> right now, but I'm not convinced that this is just coincidence.
>>
>> Aha OK. Why not put in that big comment then, thus nobody will
>> ever miss the point like I did :-)
>>
>
> I think I've just come up with a solution to this problem and would
> like to hear what Rob and Grant think about this:
>
> If we move the code that adds the resources to a platform_device
> from of_device_alloc() to platform_drv_probe(), we can defer
> looking up the interrupt number until the driver actually gets
> probed and bail out early with -EPROBE_DEFER if the irq domain
> is not available yet. That will even work when we have a builtin
> driver for a device that uses a GPIO interrupt and the gpio controller
> driver is a loadable module.
>
That certainly seems like a plausible solution and I don't have any
thing better to suggest. Does that affect non-DT platform devices in a
negative way?
Rob
> Arnd
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-20 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-17 10:43 [PATCH 0/16] Another round of Device Tree enablement for Snowball Lee Jones
2012-04-17 10:43 ` [PATCH 01/16] ARM: ux500: Enable the external bus with Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-04-18 15:54 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-17 10:43 ` [PATCH 02/16] drivers/gpio: gpio-nomadik: Add support for irqdomains Lee Jones
2012-04-18 16:09 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-18 16:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-18 16:26 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-19 16:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-20 3:01 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2012-05-17 21:49 ` Grant Likely
2012-04-20 6:47 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-17 10:43 ` [PATCH 03/16] ARM: ux500: Use correct format for dynamic IRQ assignment Lee Jones
2012-04-18 16:11 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-17 10:43 ` [PATCH 04/16] drivers/net: Do not free an IRQ if its request failed Lee Jones
2012-04-18 16:12 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-17 10:43 ` [PATCH 05/16] ARM: ux500: New DT:ed snowball_platform_devs for one-by-one device enablement Lee Jones
2012-04-17 10:43 ` [PATCH 06/16] ARM: ux500: New DT:ed u8500_init_devices " Lee Jones
2012-04-17 10:43 ` [PATCH 07/16] ARM: ux500: Enable the SMSC9115 on Snowball via Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-04-18 16:16 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-17 10:44 ` [PATCH 08/16] drivers/mmc: MMCI: Use correct GPIO binding for IRQ requests Lee Jones
2012-04-18 16:18 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-17 10:44 ` [PATCH 09/16] ARM: ux500: Correctly describe SMSC9115 for Snowball in DT Lee Jones
2012-04-17 10:44 ` [PATCH 10/16] drivers/gpio: represent gpio-nomadik as an IRQ controller in DT documentation Lee Jones
2012-04-17 14:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-17 15:32 ` Lee Jones
2012-04-17 15:45 ` [PATCH 10/16 v2] " Lee Jones
2012-04-17 15:58 ` Lee Jones
2012-04-17 10:44 ` [PATCH 11/16] ARM: ux500: Do not attempt to register non-existent i2c devices on Snowball Lee Jones
2012-04-17 14:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-17 15:28 ` Lee Jones
2012-04-17 15:44 ` [PATCH 11/16 v2] " Lee Jones
2012-04-17 16:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-17 10:44 ` [PATCH 12/16] mfd/db8500-prcmu: Register as a platform driver instead of only probing Lee Jones
2012-04-18 16:19 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-17 10:44 ` [PATCH 13/16] mfd/db8500-prcmu: Add Device Tree support Lee Jones
2012-04-18 16:35 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-17 10:44 ` [PATCH 14/16] ARM: ux500: Fork cpu-db8500 platform_devs for sequential DT enablement Lee Jones
2012-04-17 10:44 ` [PATCH 15/16] ARM: ux500: Apply Device Tree settings for the DB8500 PRCMU Lee Jones
2012-04-17 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-17 15:30 ` Lee Jones
2012-04-17 15:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-04-17 15:46 ` Lee Jones
2012-04-17 15:56 ` [PATCH 13&15/16 v2] " Lee Jones
2012-04-18 16:21 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-17 10:44 ` [PATCH 16/16] ARM: ux500: Enable PRCMU Timer 4 (clocksource) via Device Tree Lee Jones
2012-04-17 14:49 ` [PATCH 0/16] Another round of Device Tree enablement for Snowball Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F90D19B.9020408@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).