linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2] watchdog: mpcore: Add DT probing support for ARM mpcore watchdog
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:49:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F957A0C.7060607@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOh2x=n5Zm9MR5twDY-CUA-ppE9ADXrg25XCT5RKM++v6=tcpA@mail.gmail.com>

On 23/04/12 16:33, viresh kumar wrote:
> On 4/23/12, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>> On 23/04/12 15:21, viresh kumar wrote:
>>> On 4/23/12, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> wrote:
>>>> Ah, that explains why it worked. I suppose you do have additional
>>>> patches that fix the IRQ request bit?
>>>
>>> Missed this earlier. That patchset is in review currently and have
>>> already fixed that. :)
>>
>> Right. Please post that patch as a prerequisite for any other change.
> 
> Haah!! I misread your question. I don't know how, but i thought you are
> asking me to fix this address for SPEAr (My SoC). And that patch set
> is currently in review.
> 
> I didn't get this IRQ request bit thing? Can you please explain.

The TWD watchdog uses a per-cpu interrupt (usually interrupt #30), and
the GIC configuration should flag it as such. With this setup,
request_irq() should fail, and the right API is request_percpu_irq(),
together with enable_percpu_irq()/disable_percpu_irq().

So how it works in your environment is a bit puzzling. Unless you're not
using GIC?

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-23 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-20 14:42 [PATCH] watchdog: mpcore: Add DT bindings for ARM mpcore watchdog Viresh Kumar
2012-04-21  8:32 ` Pawel Moll
2012-04-21 11:41 ` [PATCH V2] watchdog: mpcore: Add DT probing support " Viresh Kumar
2012-04-23  8:36   ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 11:35     ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 12:15       ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 12:21         ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 14:21         ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 15:22           ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 15:33             ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 15:49               ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2012-04-23 16:01                 ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 16:12                   ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-23 16:16                     ` viresh kumar
2012-04-23 16:26                       ` Marc Zyngier
2012-04-24 10:25                         ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F957A0C.7060607@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).