[PATCH-V3 3/3] ARM: OMAP3+: clock33xx: Add AM33XX clock tree data

[b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)]

Hi Vaibhav,

On 4/25/2012 7:48 AM, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:33:26, Paul Walmsley wrote:
>> Hello Vaibhav, Afzal, Vaibhav,
>>
>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>>
>>> AM33XX clock implementation is different than any existing OMAP
>>> family of devices. Although DPLL module is similar to OMAP4
>>> device, but the usage is very much different than OMAP4.
>>> AM33XX has different peripheral set and each module gets
>>> integrated to the clock framework differently than OMAP
>>> family of devices.
>>>
>>> This patch adds full Clock tree data for AM33XX family
>>> of devices and also integrates it into existing OMAP framework.
>>
>> What do you think about the possibility of removing all of the leaf clocks
>> that have AM33XX_MODULEMODE_SWCTRL as their .enable_bit, assuming there
>> are no .fixed_div or .clksel* fields associated with the clocks?
>>
>> In theory, I don't think they are needed.  The drivers should be using
>> runtime PM, and that should enable and disable the module via the hwmod
>> code, rather than the clock code.
>>
>> Of course some clocks would still be needed for the main_clk fields for
>> the hwmods, but the hwmods should be able to use the leaf clock's parent
>> clocks for that.
>>
>> That would save quite a few lines of data.  And I think Beno?t is planning
>> to do that for OMAP4+.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>
> Paul,
>
> Yes, theoretically it is possible to do it. But it will also break some of
> the existing things, like,
>
> 1. DebugFS clock interface
>
> I believe, with this change, you will not have all the leaf nodes as part of clock tree, so they will not be populated in /debug/clock/
>
> 2. Enable and disable of the module is one part, but what about, changing
>     the rate of the clock (followparent_recalc)?
>     With the proper and complete clock tree, you can traverse the clock and
>     driver code doesn't need to know about parent.
>     Driver can simply call clk_set_rate() on leaf clock, and clock tree will
>     handle it.
>
> If at all we take this path, we have to build the clk node runtime
> (on-the-fly), AND/OR add new pm_runtime_set_rate() api.

Not at all. You just have to get the fck of that hwmod and use the clock 
API.

> Are you available on IRC chat anytime? We can discuss on this and align
> quickly.
> I am available on linux-omap irc channel (with the name = "hvaibhav")

That will not change anything, the point is that MODULEMODE_SWCTRL is 
uses for module control, not for clock directly, and that's why it is 
handled by the hwmod.

That will just replace the main_clk from the hwmod with the parent of 
the current modulemode nodes. Only the enable/disable part will be 
handled, if that node used to have a div, then the parent will handle that.

Today this module mode clock node is just a duplication of the hwmod 
node. By removing it, you will reduce the size of the data and have a 
much mode accurate representation of the reality.

Using the clock tree to handle these nodes was a hack we had to do 
because the hwmod fmwk was not ready when OMAP4 was introduced and 
because most drivers were not using pm_runtime.

Regards,
Benoit