From: skannan@codeaurora.org (Saravana Kannan)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] clk: Use a separate struct for holding init data.
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:28:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F98EB10.2000505@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1335419936-10881-1-git-send-email-skannan@codeaurora.org>
On 04/25/2012 10:58 PM, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> Create a struct clk_init_data to hold all data that needs to be passed from
> the platfrom specific driver to the common clock framework during clock
> registration. Add a pointer to this struct inside clk_hw.
>
> This has several advantages:
> * Completely hides struct clk from many clock platform drivers and static
> clock initialization code that don't care for static initialization of
> the struct clks.
> * For platforms that want to do complete static initialization, it removed
> the need to directly mess with the struct clk's fields while still
> allowing to statically allocate struct clk. This keeps the code more
> future proof even if they include clk-private.h.
> * Simplifies the generic clk_register() function and allows adding optional
> fields in the future without modifying the function signature.
> * Simplifies the static initialization of clocks on all platforms by
> removing the need for forward delcarations or convoluted macros.
<SNIP>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> index 90627e4..8ea11b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_divider(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> {
<SNIP>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> index b555a04..cbd2462 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c
> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_fixed_rate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> {
<SNIP>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c b/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c
> index 0021616..578465e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-gate.c
> @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_gate(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> {
<SNIP>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c b/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c
> index 6e58f11..8e97491 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-mux.c
> @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ struct clk *clk_register_mux(struct device *dev, const char *name,
> {
I would really like to remove these functions. At least until we add
device tree support where each clock is listed in device tree.
At present, these functions seem to be abused more than actually being
used appropriately. IMHO, these should not be used to register clocks in
your probe function by calling these functions one at a time. Just
declare the clocks statically and call clk_register in a loop on them.
The only time I see these functions as being appropriate is when the
list of clocks in your device is detected by actually probing (reading
registers) HW or by parsing device tree (haven't followed it closely,
but still seems to be work in progress).
Regards,
Saravana
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-26 6:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-26 5:58 [PATCH] clk: Use a separate struct for holding init data Saravana Kannan
2012-04-26 6:28 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2012-04-26 8:42 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-26 9:36 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-26 9:51 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-30 19:30 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-30 22:19 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-04-30 22:46 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-05-01 8:11 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-01 9:13 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-05-01 17:00 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-01 18:03 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-05-01 18:19 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-02 1:56 ` Mike Turquette
2012-05-02 2:14 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-02 5:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-05-02 19:19 ` Mike Turquette
2012-05-02 13:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-02 15:28 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-01 18:04 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-04-26 8:39 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-04-26 9:15 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-04-26 9:49 ` Mark Brown
2012-05-02 2:04 ` Mike Turquette
2012-05-02 4:42 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-05-02 19:07 ` Mike Turquette
2012-05-02 9:58 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-05-02 10:02 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-02 10:11 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-05-03 23:03 ` Domenico Andreoli
2012-05-04 1:11 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-05-04 6:50 ` Domenico Andreoli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F98EB10.2000505@codeaurora.org \
--to=skannan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).