From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre) Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:31:34 +0200 Subject: [GIT PULL] net/at91: at91_ether fixes for 3.4-rc In-Reply-To: <20120426.061212.570213998793556907.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4F991210.8060409@atmel.com> <20120426.052006.1832921763623188173.davem@davemloft.net> <4F991E6D.4020303@atmel.com> <20120426.061212.570213998793556907.davem@davemloft.net> Message-ID: <4F992406.8020306@atmel.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/26/2012 12:12 PM, David Miller : > From: Nicolas Ferre > Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:07:41 +0200 > >> So, should I repost both of them as patch series? > > Yes, with a leading "[PATCH 0/N] " posting as I asked. Ok, done! Thanks, bye, -- Nicolas Ferre