From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 18:00:20 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 14/15] drivers/regulators: Enable the ab8500 for Device Tree In-Reply-To: <20120508145758.GV15893@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1336155805-18554-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1336155805-18554-15-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20120507170832.GO17002@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FA90BE1.3050304@linaro.org> <20120508121940.GL15893@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FA913BA.30908@linaro.org> <20120508133411.GP15893@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <4FA93391.8040905@linaro.org> <20120508145758.GV15893@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <4FA95124.5010309@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 08/05/12 15:57, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 03:54:09PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: >> On 08/05/12 14:34, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> Looking at the usage here it looks like most of this stuff shouldn't be >>> there even with non-DT stuff, we probably don't want to add DT bindings >>> for those bits.All the voltage setting is not at all device specific >>> and can be done using the generic regulator bindings, the forcing on or >>> off is similarly generic. > >> All the generic properties _are_ set using the generic bindings. The >> only vendor specific values are the initialisation register values >> referenced above. I'll see what happens when I remove those from DT. >> I have a feeling that the regulators will just fail though. > > The comments in the arch/arm file indicate otherwise - they were talking > about enabling and disabling regulators, and about setting voltages. It > may be that the comments in the arch/arm code are inaccurate but with it > being magic numbers you'd really hope they're accurate... Fingers crossed. I'll let you know how I get on. >>> While looking for the original patch I also noticed that you're not CCing >>> the mailing list either... please always CC the subsystem mailing list >>> on patches. > >> You don't appear to have one. I ran get_maintainer.pl on the patch >> and the only ML it came up with was LKML. If you do have one, you >> may need to update the MAINTAINERS file. > > LKML is the relevant list here. Ah, okay. In retrospect I don't know why I didn't add it to be honest. I'll endeavor to do so next time. Kind regards, Lee -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead M: +44 77 88 633 515 Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog