From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP3/4: consolidate cpuidle Makefile
Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 23:02:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA989DC.2030800@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wr4mmmgn.fsf@ti.com>
On 05/08/2012 10:44 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> writes:
>
>> Define a CPU_IDLE section in the makefile, declare the functions in
>> the header files conforming to the kernel coding rules and remove the
>> 'define's in the C files.
>>
>> CONFIG_PM is enabled when CPU_IDLE is enabled because the cpuidle drivers
>> use some functions from the pm subsystem.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano<daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Jean Pihet<j-pihet@ti.com>
>
> The changelog doesn't really answer "why" this change is needed. IOW, I
> don't understand from the changelog exactly what problem this patch is
> trying to solve.
>
> AFAICT, it's just shuffling around the dependencies, and changes the
> omap*_idle_init() calls into inline nops instead of function call nops.
Ok, I will modify the changelog. I'm always bad with the changelogs,
this is something I have to improve :) I'm the first one to be happy
when I find a nice description in the patches log.
Thanks.
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-08 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-04 17:18 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP3/4: cpuidle - misc fixes Daniel Lezcano
2012-05-04 17:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP3: cpuidle - check the powerdomain lookup Daniel Lezcano
2012-05-04 21:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-04 17:18 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP3/4: consolidate cpuidle Makefile Daniel Lezcano
2012-05-08 20:25 ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-05-08 20:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 20:44 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-08 21:02 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FA989DC.2030800@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).