From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring) Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 08:40:01 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] clk: add DT clock binding support In-Reply-To: <20120501225900.GC17311@gmail.com> References: <1334003101-17274-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <1334003101-17274-4-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <20120501225900.GC17311@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4FB10B31.7080207@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/01/2012 05:59 PM, Mike Turquette wrote: > On 20120409-15:25, Rob Herring wrote: >> From: Grant Likely > snip >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt | 117 ++++++++++++++++ >> .../devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt | 22 +++ >> drivers/clk/clk.c | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> drivers/clk/clkdev.c | 77 +++++++++++ >> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 14 ++ >> include/linux/clk.h | 19 +++ >> 6 files changed, 389 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/clock-bindings.txt >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/fixed-clock.txt > > Hi Rob, > > Patches 1 & 2 are trivial and certainly aimed at clk-next, so I've taken > them in. This patch is a bit more difficult as it touches the common > clk code, clkdev/clk.h and some DT docs. > > Are you looking for me to take this patch into clk-next? I'm just > trying to avoid any more clk dependency issues than we already have... > I think that makes the most sense as it appears I'm dependent on clk-next now. I'm rebasing my patches on clk-next now. Rob