From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: b-cousson@ti.com (Cousson, Benoit)
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 17:06:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] OMAP2+: Add SoC specific map_io functions
In-Reply-To: <20120504175942.5ceb8e91@skate>
References: <1316809399-19579-1-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com>
 <1316809399-19579-2-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com>
 <20120504175942.5ceb8e91@skate>
Message-ID: <4FB11F63.2010108@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Salut Thomas,

Sorry for the delay.

On 5/4/2012 5:59 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Hello Benoit,
>
> Le Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:23:09 +0200,
> Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>  a ?crit :
>
>> Add SoC specific map_io function to be used by the generic DT
>> board file. This is an intermediate step before having some
>> generic DT aware map_io function.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
>> Cc: Tony Lindgren<tony@atomide.com>
>
> Do you know if some progress has been made on having a generic DT aware
> map_io function, or is the per-SoC ->map_io() function still the
> recommended way of handling SoC having different requirements of static
> mappings at boot time?

Mmm, Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm not sure people are really pushing to 
store that inside DT. But to be honest, I don't really know :-)

Tony might have some clue.

Regards,
Benoit