linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Compile err with raumfeld_defconfig
@ 2012-05-15  7:25 jgq516 at gmail.com
  2012-05-15 14:09 ` Daniel Mack
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: jgq516 at gmail.com @ 2012-05-15  7:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hi,

Does somebody notice this compile err with raumfeld_defconfig as follows?

drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c: In function 'eeti_ts_irq_active':
drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c:65:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'irq_to_gpio'

Regards,
Xiao

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Compile err with raumfeld_defconfig
  2012-05-15  7:25 Compile err with raumfeld_defconfig jgq516 at gmail.com
@ 2012-05-15 14:09 ` Daniel Mack
  2012-05-16 19:51   ` Arnd Bergmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Mack @ 2012-05-15 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 15.05.2012 09:25, jgq516 at gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Does somebody notice this compile err with raumfeld_defconfig as follows?
> 
> drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c: In function 'eeti_ts_irq_active':
> drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c:65:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'irq_to_gpio'

Yes, this is being worked on. Thanks for noticing, though :)


Daniel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Compile err with raumfeld_defconfig
  2012-05-15 14:09 ` Daniel Mack
@ 2012-05-16 19:51   ` Arnd Bergmann
  2012-05-17  7:49     ` Xiao Jiang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2012-05-16 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Tuesday 15 May 2012, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 15.05.2012 09:25, jgq516 at gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Does somebody notice this compile err with raumfeld_defconfig as follows?
> > 
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c: In function 'eeti_ts_irq_active':
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c:65:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'irq_to_gpio'
> 
> Yes, this is being worked on. Thanks for noticing, though :)

Does this work for you?
8<---
input/eeti_ts: pass gpio line in platform data

irq_to_gpio() was removed, so we have to pass the gpio number separately.

Without this patch, building raumfeld_defconfig results in:

/home/arnd/linux-arm/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c: In function 'eeti_ts_irq_active':
/home/arnd/linux-arm/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c:65:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'irq_to_gpio' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
make[4]: *** [drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.o] Error 1
make[3]: *** [drivers/input/touchscreen] Error 2
make[2]: *** [drivers/input] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [sub-make] Error 2

Generated by script, please check manually

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
 arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c        |    1 +
 drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c |    8 +++++---
 include/linux/input/eeti_ts.h       |    1 +
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
index 5905ed1..9e1c4ea 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
@@ -953,6 +953,7 @@ static struct i2c_board_info raumfeld_connector_i2c_board_info __initdata = {
 
 static struct eeti_ts_platform_data eeti_ts_pdata = {
 	.irq_active_high = 1,
+	.gpio = GPIO_TOUCH_IRQ,
 };
 
 static struct i2c_board_info raumfeld_controller_i2c_board_info __initdata = {
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
index 503c709..45dab18 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct eeti_ts_priv {
 	struct input_dev *input;
 	struct work_struct work;
 	struct mutex mutex;
-	int irq, irq_active_high;
+	int irq, gpio, irq_active_high;
 };
 
 #define EETI_TS_BITDEPTH	(11)
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct eeti_ts_priv {
 
 static inline int eeti_ts_irq_active(struct eeti_ts_priv *priv)
 {
-	return gpio_get_value(irq_to_gpio(priv->irq)) == priv->irq_active_high;
+	return gpio_get_value(priv->gpio) == priv->irq_active_high;
 }
 
 static void eeti_ts_read(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -203,8 +203,10 @@ static int __devinit eeti_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 
 	pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
 
-	if (pdata)
+	if (pdata) {
+		priv->gpio = pdata->gpio;
 		priv->irq_active_high = pdata->irq_active_high;
+	}
 
 	irq_flags = priv->irq_active_high ?
 		IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING : IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING;
diff --git a/include/linux/input/eeti_ts.h b/include/linux/input/eeti_ts.h
index f875b31..3404504 100644
--- a/include/linux/input/eeti_ts.h
+++ b/include/linux/input/eeti_ts.h
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 
 struct eeti_ts_platform_data {
 	unsigned int irq_active_high;
+	unsigned int gpio;
 };
 
 #endif /* LINUX_INPUT_EETI_TS_H */
-- 
1.7.10

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Compile err with raumfeld_defconfig
  2012-05-16 19:51   ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2012-05-17  7:49     ` Xiao Jiang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xiao Jiang @ 2012-05-17  7:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 May 2012, Daniel Mack wrote:
>   
>> On 15.05.2012 09:25, jgq516 at gmail.com wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Does somebody notice this compile err with raumfeld_defconfig as follows?
>>>
>>> drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c: In function 'eeti_ts_irq_active':
>>> drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c:65:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'irq_to_gpio'
>>>       
>> Yes, this is being worked on. Thanks for noticing, though :)
>>     
>
> Does this work for you?
> 8<---
> input/eeti_ts: pass gpio line in platform data
>
> irq_to_gpio() was removed, so we have to pass the gpio number separately.
>
> Without this patch, building raumfeld_defconfig results in:
>
> /home/arnd/linux-arm/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c: In function 'eeti_ts_irq_active':
> /home/arnd/linux-arm/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c:65:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'irq_to_gpio' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> make[4]: *** [drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.o] Error 1
> make[3]: *** [drivers/input/touchscreen] Error 2
> make[2]: *** [drivers/input] Error 2
> make[1]: *** [drivers] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make: *** [sub-make] Error 2
>
> Generated by script, please check manually
>   
Compile with raumfeld_defconfig ok after apply this patch manually.
Tested-by: Xiao Jiang <jgq516@gmail.com>

Regards,
Xiao
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c        |    1 +
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c |    8 +++++---
>  include/linux/input/eeti_ts.h       |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
> index 5905ed1..9e1c4ea 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/raumfeld.c
> @@ -953,6 +953,7 @@ static struct i2c_board_info raumfeld_connector_i2c_board_info __initdata = {
>  
>  static struct eeti_ts_platform_data eeti_ts_pdata = {
>  	.irq_active_high = 1,
> +	.gpio = GPIO_TOUCH_IRQ,
>  };
>  
>  static struct i2c_board_info raumfeld_controller_i2c_board_info __initdata = {
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
> index 503c709..45dab18 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/eeti_ts.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct eeti_ts_priv {
>  	struct input_dev *input;
>  	struct work_struct work;
>  	struct mutex mutex;
> -	int irq, irq_active_high;
> +	int irq, gpio, irq_active_high;
>  };
>  
>  #define EETI_TS_BITDEPTH	(11)
> @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ struct eeti_ts_priv {
>  
>  static inline int eeti_ts_irq_active(struct eeti_ts_priv *priv)
>  {
> -	return gpio_get_value(irq_to_gpio(priv->irq)) == priv->irq_active_high;
> +	return gpio_get_value(priv->gpio) == priv->irq_active_high;
>  }
>  
>  static void eeti_ts_read(struct work_struct *work)
> @@ -203,8 +203,10 @@ static int __devinit eeti_ts_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>  
>  	pdata = client->dev.platform_data;
>  
> -	if (pdata)
> +	if (pdata) {
> +		priv->gpio = pdata->gpio;
>  		priv->irq_active_high = pdata->irq_active_high;
> +	}
>  
>  	irq_flags = priv->irq_active_high ?
>  		IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING : IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING;
> diff --git a/include/linux/input/eeti_ts.h b/include/linux/input/eeti_ts.h
> index f875b31..3404504 100644
> --- a/include/linux/input/eeti_ts.h
> +++ b/include/linux/input/eeti_ts.h
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
>  
>  struct eeti_ts_platform_data {
>  	unsigned int irq_active_high;
> +	unsigned int gpio;
>  };
>  
>  #endif /* LINUX_INPUT_EETI_TS_H */
>   

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-05-17  7:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-05-15  7:25 Compile err with raumfeld_defconfig jgq516 at gmail.com
2012-05-15 14:09 ` Daniel Mack
2012-05-16 19:51   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-17  7:49     ` Xiao Jiang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).