Query about: ARM11 MPCore: preemption/task migration cache coherency

[snakky.zhang@gmail.com (snakky.zhang at gmail.com)]

On 2012?05?31? 15:21, bill4carson wrote:
>
>
> On 2012?05?31? 14:56, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 06:51:22AM +0100, bill4carson wrote:
>>> On 2012?05?31? 13:19, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>>> On 31 May 2012 13:06, bill4carson<bill4carson@gmail.com>   wrote:
>>>>> On 2012?05?31? 11:58, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>>>>> I still didn't fully understand what the problem is. So, to make 
>>>>>> sure,
>>>>>> if you run some applications from flash using a yaffs filesystem, 
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> get random crashes. Is this correct? If yes, a solution is to 
>>>>>> actually
>>>>>> call flush_dcache_page() on the CPU that does the page copying from
>>>>>> flash into RAM, which could be the yaffs filesystem.
>>>>>
>>>>> The story goes like this:
>>>>> function "flush_dcache_page" should be global effective
>>>>> but in ARMv6 MPCore, it was not, it was just local effective due
>>>>> to hardware design.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I know this.
>>>
>>> Then, why not fix "flush_dcache_page" to make it globally effective?
>>
>> Performance?
>>
>> And it's also just ARM11MPCore microarchitecture specific.
>>
Yes, seems newer CPUs has no such limitation thus this function is 
global effective naturally. :-)

And , I find Mips's c-r4k also has this issue but it use IPI to make it. 
Details in arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c.

 From my point of view, PREEMPT should not related to CPU type. So if 
this type of CPU does not support PREEMPT for performance reason, can we 
add something in Documentation and related Kconfig to make/mark it?

Or maybe disable task migration is also a choice. :-)

Thanks
Xiao
>>>>> This may cause error in some cases for example:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Task running on Core-0 loading text section into memory.
>>>>>     It was preempted and then migrate into Core-1;
>>>>
>>>> BTW, do you have CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled?
>>>>
>>> Yes, CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled. Thus cause the task was preempted. :-)
>>
>> I told you that CONFIG_PREEMPT is not supported on ARM11MPCore :).
>
> Point!
>
> Is it better to add comment, such as "PREEMPT is not supported for
> ARM11MPCore" in somewhere(for now, I don't find such place)?
> then custom will be alerted with such notice when they trying change
> to PREEMPT.
>
> And again, thanks for your patience with me :)
>
>
>>
>>>> To be clear - is your application reading some data from flash and
>>>> trying to execute or it's the kernel doing the load via the
>>>> page/prefetch abort mechanism?
>>>
>>> In my current case, it is yaffs root file system.
>>>
>>>> If the latter, task running on core 0 gets a prefetch abort when
>>>> trying to execute some code. The kernel reads the page from flash (via
>>>> mtd, block layer, VFS) and copies it into RAM. It can be on any CPU as
>>>> long as it calls flush_dcache_page on the same CPU that copied the
>>>> data.
>>>>
>>>> No matter where the task was running or migrated to, if the code doing
>>>> the copy also called flush_dcache_page() on the same core, there is no
>>>> data left in the D-cache for that page.
>>>
>>> Yes, I agree with it.
>>> But how to flush the data cache on the same core with PREEMPT enabled?
>>
>> That's not easily possible. But you may get better results with
>> VOLUNTARY_PREEMPT.
>>
>>> And, I think according to the design, there is no such operation that
>>> guarantee it.
>>
>> RFO/WFO tricks only work on ARM11MPCore.
>>
>>> But any way, I think flush_dcache_page should be global effective.
>>> If ARMv6 MPCore didn't make it, we should try to accomplish it.
>>
>> Do some performance tests first.
>>
>